Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38446481›Full record

Trial reportJAMA network open2024

Diagnostic Stewardship in Community-Acquired Pneumonia With Syndromic Molecular Testing: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Dagfinn L Markussen, Sondre Serigstad, Christian Ritz, Siri T Knoop, Marit H Ebbesen, Daniel Faurholt-Jepsen, Lars Heggelund, Cornelis H van Werkhoven, Tristan W Clark, Rune O Bjørneklett and 3 more

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialEquivalence Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA network open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT04660084 (Impact of Molecular Testing on Improved Diagnosis, Treatment and Management of CAP in Norway), which is not on this map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
31.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04660084 naterminatednot on this map

Impact of Molecular Testing on Improved Diagnosis, Treatment and Management of CAP in Norway: a Pragmatic Randomised Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorHaukeland University HospitalRan2020 to 2022Enrolled374ConditionsPneumoniaArmsUltra-rapid molecular point-of-care testing
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 81 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Challenges and opportunities in the management of severe pneumonia. Key concepts from the Seventh Annual Meeting of Spanish Experts 2025.Revista espanola de quimioterapia : publicacion oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Quimioterapia · 2026
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Rapid commercial CTX-M diagnostics: Performance, limitations and clinical impact.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2026
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Dagfinn L MarkussenDepartment of Clinical Science, Bergen Integrated Diagnostic Stewardship Cluster, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Sondre SerigstadDepartment of Clinical Science, Bergen Integrated Diagnostic Stewardship Cluster, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Christian RitzDepartment of Clinical Science, Bergen Integrated Diagnostic Stewardship Cluster, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Siri T KnoopDepartment of Clinical Science, Bergen Integrated Diagnostic Stewardship Cluster, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Marit H EbbesenDepartment of Microbiology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
Daniel Faurholt-JepsenNational Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Lars HeggelundDepartment of Clinical Science, Bergen Integrated Diagnostic Stewardship Cluster, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Cornelis H van WerkhovenJulius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Tristan W ClarkSchool of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.
Rune O BjørneklettEmergency Care Clinic, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
Øyvind KommedalDepartment of Microbiology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
Elling UlvestadDepartment of Clinical Science, Bergen Integrated Diagnostic Stewardship Cluster, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Harleen M S GrewalDepartment of Clinical Science, Bergen Integrated Diagnostic Stewardship Cluster, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Haukeland University Hospital · NOUniversity of Bergen · NOUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NLUniversity of Southampton · GBUniversity of Southern Denmark · DKVestre Viken Hospital Trust · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Lower respiratory tract (LRT) infections, including community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), are a leading cause of hospital admissions and mortality. Molecular tests have the potential to optimize treatment decisions and management of CAP, but limited evidence exists to support their routine use. Objective: To determine whether the judicious use of a syndromic polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based panel for rapid testing of CAP in the emergency department (ED) leads to faster, more accurate microbiological test result-based treatment. Design, Setting, and Participants: This parallel-arm, single-blinded, single-center, randomized clinical superiority trial was conducted between September 25, 2020, and June 21, 2022, in the ED of Haukeland University Hospital, a large tertiary care hospital in Bergen, Norway. Adult patients who presented to the ED with suspected CAP were recruited. Participants were randomized 1:1 to either the intervention arm or standard-of-care arm. The primary outcomes were analyzed according to the intention-to-treat principle. Intervention: Patients randomized to the intervention arm received rapid syndromic PCR testing (BioFire FilmArray Pneumonia plus Panel; bioMérieux) of LRT samples and standard of care. Patients randomized to the standard-of-care arm received standard microbiological diagnostics alone. Main Outcomes and Measures: The 2 primary outcomes were the provision of pathogen-directed treatment based on a microbiological test result and the time to provision of pathogen-directed treatment (within 48 hours after randomization). Results: There were 374 patients (221 males [59.1%]; median (IQR) age, 72 [60-79] years) included in the trial, with 187 in each treatment arm. Analysis of primary outcomes showed that 66 patients (35.3%) in the intervention arm and 25 (13.4%) in the standard-of-care arm received pathogen-directed treatment, corresponding to a reduction in absolute risk of 21.9 (95% CI, 13.5-30.3) percentage points and an odds ratio for the intervention arm of 3.53 (95% CI, 2.13-6.02; P < .001). The median (IQR) time to provision of pathogen-directed treatment within 48 hours was 34.5 (31.6-37.3) hours in the intervention arm and 43.8 (42.0-45.6) hours in the standard-of-care arm (mean difference, -9.4 hours; 95% CI, -12.7 to -6.0 hours; P < .001). The corresponding hazard ratio for intervention compared with standard of care was 3.08 (95% CI, 1.95-4.89). Findings remained significant after adjustment for season. Conclusions and Relevance: Results of this randomized clinical trial indicated that routine deployment of PCR testing for LRT pathogens led to faster and more targeted microbial treatment for patients with suspected CAP. Rapid molecular testing could complement or replace selected standard, time-consuming, laboratory-based diagnostics. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04660084.

Indexed as

Community-Acquired InfectionsPneumoniaRespiratory Tract InfectionsAgedEmergency Service, HospitalHospitalizationHumansMaleMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID38446481
PMCPMC10918504
OpenAlexW4392505213

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.