ArticleIUCrJ2024
Transferable Hirshfeld atom model for rapid evaluation of aspherical atomic form factors.
Article in IUCrJ, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Application of electrostatic and multi-layer embedding in Hirshfeld atom refinements: a cost-effective approach for approximating bulk effects in crystalline environments.Journal of applied crystallography · 2026Article
- Periodic Hirshfeld Atom Refinement.The journal of physical chemistry letters · 2026Article
- Benchmarking crystal structure refinement: A systematic study on Hirshfeld atom refinement.Structural dynamics (Melville, N.Y.) · 2025Article
- Two metrics for quantifying systematic errors in diffraction experiments: systematic errors in the variance of the observed intensities and agreement factor gap.Journal of applied crystallography · 2025Article
- Benchmarking quantum chemical methods with X-ray structures via structure-specific restraints.IUCrJ · 2025Article
- Multipole Expansion of the Scalar Potential on the Basis of Spherical Harmonics: Bridging the Gap Between the Inside and Outside Spaces via Solution of the Poisson Equation.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Article
- Solid-state calculations for iterative refinement in quantum crystallography using the multipole model.IUCrJ · 2025Article
- Towards improved accuracy of Hirshfeld atom refinement with an alternative electron density partition.IUCrJ · 2025Article
- Current developments and trends in quantum crystallography.Acta crystallographica Section B, Structural science, crystal engineering and materials · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Form factors based on aspherical models of atomic electron density have brought great improvement in the accuracies of hydrogen atom parameters derived from X-ray crystal structure refinement. Today, two main groups of such models are available, the banks of transferable atomic densities parametrized using the Hansen-Coppens multipole model which allows for rapid evaluation of atomic form factors and Hirshfeld atom refinement (HAR)-related methods which are usually more accurate but also slower. In this work, a model that combines the ideas utilized in the two approaches is tested. It uses atomic electron densities based on Hirshfeld partitions of electron densities, which are precalculated and stored in a databank. This model was also applied during the refinement of the structures of five small molecules. A comparison of the resulting hydrogen atom parameters with those derived from neutron diffraction data indicates that they are more accurate than those obtained with the Hansen-Coppens based databank, and only slightly less accurate than those obtained with a version of HAR that neglects the crystal environment. The advantage of using HAR becomes more noticeable when the effects of the environment are included. To speed up calculations, atomic densities were represented by multipole expansion with spherical harmonics up to l = 7, which used numerical radial functions (a different approach to that applied in the Hansen-Coppens model). Calculations of atomic form factors for the small protein crambin (at 0.73 Å resolution) took only 68 s using 12 CPU cores.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.