ArticleUpdates in surgery2024
Interactive model for predicting the oncological outcome of patients with early-stage huge hepatocellular carcinoma after hepatectomy: a multicenter population-based study.
Article in Updates in surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
An interactive model for predicting the oncological outcome of patients with early-stage huge hepatocellular carcinoma (ES-HHCC) after hepatectomy is still lacking. This study was aimed at exploring the independent risk parameters and developing an interactive model for predicting the cancer-specific survival (CSS) of ES-HHCC. Data from patients with ES-HHCC who underwent hepatectomy were collected. The dimensionality of the clinical features was reduced by least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression and further screened as predictors of CSS by Cox regression. Then, an interactive prediction model was developed and validated. Among the 514 screened patients, 311 and 203 of them were assigned into the training and validation cohort, respectively. Six independent variables, including alpha-fetoprotein, cirrhosis, microvascular invasion, satellite, tumor morphology, and tumor diameter, were identified and incorporated into the prediction model for CSS. The model achieved C-indices of 0.724 and 0.711 in the training and validation cohorts, respectively. Calibration curves showed general consistency in both cohorts. Compared with single predictor, the model had a better performance and greater benefit according to the time-independent receiver operating characteristic curve and decision curve analysis (P < 0.05). The calculator owned satisfactory accuracy and flexible operability for predicting the CSS of ES-HHCC, which could serve as a practical tool to stratify patients with different risks, and guide decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.