ArticleInternal and emergency medicine2024
Acetaminophen overdose: analysis of 2018 US nationwide emergency database.
Article in Internal and emergency medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Developing Longitudinal Post-Overdose Care: A Call to Action.Journal of medical toxicology : official journal of the American College of Medical Toxicology · 2026Article
- Imidazole Alkaloids Epiisopilosine and Epiisopiloturine Attenuate Acetaminophen-Induced Liver Toxicity in Mice via Autophagy Modulation and Anti-Inflammatory Effects.Journal of biochemical and molecular toxicology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionRecognized risk factors for acetaminophen overdose include alcohol, opioids, and mood disorders. The aim of this study is to assess additional risk factors for acetaminophen overdose evaluated in the emergency department (ED).
methodsA retrospective study was performed using the 2018 US Nationwide Emergency Department Sample (NEDS). All adult ED visits for acetaminophen overdose were included in the study group and those without it were taken as control. STATA, 16.1 was used to perform multivariable logistic regression analysis and adjusted odds ratios (ORadj) were reported.
resultsWe identified 27,792 ED visits for acetaminophen overdose. Relative to non-acetaminophen ED visits, this group was younger (median age 32 vs 47 years; p < 0.0001), more often female (66.1% vs 57.0%; p < 0.0001), had higher ED charges ($3,506 vs $2,714; p < 0.0001), higher proportion of alcohol-related disorders (15.8% vs 3.5%; p < 0.0001), anxiety disorders (30.2% vs 8.3%; p < 0.0001), cannabis use (8.7% vs 1.4%; p < 0.0001), hematology/oncology diagnoses (13.3% vs 10.9%; p < 0.0001), mood disorders (52.4% vs 7.9%; p < 0.0001), opioid-related disorders (4.1% vs 1.0%; p < 0.0001), and suicide attempt/ideation (12.2% vs 1.1%; p < 0.0001). Multivariable analysis showed alcohol-related disorders (ORadj 2.67), anxiety disorders (ORadj 1.24), cannabis (ORadj 1.63), females (ORadj 1.45), Income Q3 (ORadj 1.09), hematology/oncology diagnoses (ORadj 1.40), mood disorders (ORadj 10.07), opioid-related disorders (ORadj 1.20), and suicide attempt/ideation (ORadj 1.68) were associated with acetaminophen overdose.
conclusionIn addition to previously recognized risks, our study demonstrated that cannabis use and hematologic/oncologic comorbidities were more common among acetaminophen-overdose ED visits. These new findings are concerning because of rapid legalization of cannabis and the increasing incidence of cancer worldwide. Additional investigation into these risks should be a priority for clinicians, policymakers, and researchers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.