Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38446265›Full record

Trial reportJournal of autism and developmental disorders2025

A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial of Motivation-Based Social Skills Group Treatment with Parent Training.

Jane Shkel, Alicia Geng, Elise Pilchak, Maria Estefania Millan, Jessica M Schwartzman, Rachel Schuck, Maria Victoria Bundang, Agatha Barnowski, Devon M Slap, Sydney Stratford and 3 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Jane ShkelStanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, USA.
Alicia GengStanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, USA.
Elise PilchakPalo Alto University, Palo Alto, USA.
Maria Estefania MillanStanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, USA.
Jessica M SchwartzmanDepartment of Pediatrics, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, USA.
Rachel SchuckStanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, USA.
Maria Victoria BundangStanford Medicine Children's Health, Stanford, USA.
Agatha BarnowskiPalo Alto University, Palo Alto, USA.
Devon M SlapStanford Medicine Children's Health, Stanford, USA.
Sydney StratfordStanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, USA.
Antonio Y HardanStanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, USA.
Jennifer M PhillipsStanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, USA.
Grace W GengouxStanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, USA. ggengoux@stanford.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6942-9513

Funding

Reward responsivity and depression in autism spectrum disorder: A multimethod approachK23MH131852 · NIMH · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI Jessica M Schwartzman · 2023 to 2026
$646k
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, School of Medicine, Stanford University NANIMH NIH HHS K23 MH131852NIMH NIH HHS K23-MH131852NIMH NIH HHS L40 MH134254
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the popularity of social skills groups, there remains a need for empirical investigation of treatment effects, especially when targeting pivotal aspects of social functioning such as initiations to peers. The goal of the present study was to conduct a randomized controlled trial of a 12-week social intervention (SUCCESS), which combined an inclusive social group with a parent education program. Twenty-five 4- to 6-year-olds with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) were randomized to SUCCESS (N = 11) or to treatment as usual (N = 14). Combining a peer group model with a parent training program, the SUCCESS intervention used naturalistic behavioral techniques (e.g., environmental arrangement, natural reinforcement) to increase social initiations to peers. After 12 weeks, children participating in the SUCCESS program made more frequent initiations to peers than children in the treatment-as-usual group, including more prompted and unprompted initiations to request. Additional gains in clinician-rated social functioning were observed in children randomized to SUCCESS, while differential treatment effects were not detected in parent-rated measures. However, lower baseline social motivation was associated with greater parent-reported initiation improvement. This study provides preliminary support for the efficacy of a naturalistic, behavioral social skills intervention to improve peer initiations for children with ASD. The findings suggest that using a motivation-based social skills group was effective in increasing both prompted and spontaneous initiations to peers, and highlights the need for further research into the role of baseline social motivation in predicting social skills treatment response.

Indexed as

Autism Spectrum DisorderBehavior TherapyMotivationParentsPsychotherapy, GroupSocial SkillsChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansMalePeer GroupPilot ProjectsTreatment OutcomeInclusionInitiationsNatural reinforcementParent trainingSocial motivationSocial skills group

Identifiers

PMID38446265
PMCPMC11687420

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.