Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38445895›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Geriatrics Society2024

National Institute on Aging's 50th anniversary: Advancing aging research and the health and well-being of older adults.

Amy Kelley, Siobhan Addie, Stacy Carrington-Lawrence, Luigi Ferrucci, Patricia Jones, Evan Hadley, Todd Haim, Jessica Harper, Shoshana Kahana, Melinda Kelley and 7 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readHistorical Article
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Amy KelleyNational Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6345-9834
Siobhan AddieNational Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0009-0002-4363-1868
Stacy Carrington-LawrenceNational Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Luigi FerrucciNational Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Patricia JonesNational Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Evan HadleyNational Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Todd HaimNational Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Jessica HarperNational Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Shoshana KahanaNational Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Melinda KelleyNational Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Ronald KohanskiNational Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3131-7364
Eliezer MasliahNational Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2117-5569
Cindy McConnellNational Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Stephanie MorrisonNational Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Lisbeth NielsenNational Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Kenneth SantoraNational Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Richard HodesNational Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8142-5742
National Institutes of Health · US

Funding

Intramural NIH HHS Z99 AG999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The National Institute on Aging (NIA), part of the National Institutes of Health (NIH), was founded in 1974 to support and conduct research on aging and the health and well-being of older adults. Fifty years ago, the concept of studying aging generated much skepticism. Early NIA-funded research findings helped establish the great value of aging research and provided the foundation for significant science advances that have improved our understanding of the aging process, diseases and conditions associated with aging, and the effects of health inequities, as well as the need to promote healthy aging lifestyles. Today, we celebrate the many important contributions to aging research made possible by NIA, as well as opportunities to continue to make meaningful progress. NIA emphasizes that the broad aging research community must continue to increase and expand our collective efforts to recruit and train a diverse next generation of aging researchers.

Indexed as

AgingAnniversaries and Special EventsBiomedical ResearchNational Institute on Aging (U.S.)AgedGeriatricsHealthy AgingHistory, 20th CenturyHistory, 21st CenturyHumansUnited Statesaging researchdiversityhealthy aging

Identifiers

PMID38445895
PMCPMC11090751
OpenAlexW4392518651

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.