Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38445717›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of radiology2024

Surface guided radiotherapy practice in paediatric oncology: a survey on behalf of the SIOPE Radiation Oncology Working Group.

Enrica Seravalli, Petra S Kroon, Stephanie Bolle, Cathy Dunlea, Semi B Harrabi, Anne Laprie, Yasmin Lassen-Ramshad, Gillian Whitfield, Geert O Janssens

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of radiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Affordable realtime respiratory monitoring system for radiation oncology.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Enrica SeravalliDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, 3508 GA, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-5983-2256
Petra S KroonDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, 3508 GA, The Netherlands.
Stephanie BolleDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Gustave Roussy Campus, Villejuif 94 800, France.
Cathy DunleaDepartment of Oncology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London NW1 2PB, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-7546-561X
Semi B HarrabiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg 69120, Germany.
Anne LaprieInstitut Claudius Regaud, Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse-Oncopole, Toulouse NeuroImaging Center, Université de Toulouse, Inserm, UPS, Toulouse 31100, France.ORCID 0000-0002-0103-7935
Yasmin Lassen-RamshadDanish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus DK-8200, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-4992-3231
Gillian WhitfieldThe Christie NHS Foundation Trust and Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester Cancer Research Centre, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester M20 4BX, United Kingdom.
Geert O JanssensDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, 3508 GA, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSurface guided radiotherapy (SGRT) is increasingly being implemented to track patient's surface movement and position during radiation therapy. However, limited information is available on the SGRT use in paediatrics. The aim of this double survey was to map SIOPE (European Society for Paediatric Oncology)-affiliated centres using SGRT and to gain information on potential indications, observed, or expected benefits.

methodsA double online survey was distributed to 246 SIOPE-affiliated radiotherapy (RT) centres. Multiple choices, yes/no, and open answers were included. The first survey (41 questions) was active from February to March 2021. A shortened version (13 questions) was repeated in March 2023 to detect trends in SGRT use within the same community.

resultsRespectively, 76/142 (54%) and 28/142 (20%) responding centres used and planned to use SGRT clinically, including 4/34 (12%) new centres since 2021. Among the SGRT users, 33/76 (43%) already applied this technology to paediatric treatments. The main benefits of improved patient comfort, better monitoring of intrafraction motion, and more accurate initial patient set-up expected by future users did not differ from current SGRT-users (P = .893). Among non-SGRT users, the main hurdles to implement SGRT were costs and time for installation. In paediatrics, SGRT is applied to all anatomical sites.

conclusionThis work provides information on the practice of SGRT in paediatrics across SIOPE-affiliated RT centres which can serve as a basis for departments when considering the purchase of SGRT systems. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: Since little information is available in the literature on the use of SGRT in paediatrics, the results of this double survey can serve as a basis for departments treating children when considering the purchase of an SGRT system.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsRadiation OncologyChildEuropeHumansPatient PositioningPediatricsPractice Patterns, Physicians'Radiotherapy, Image-GuidedSurveys and Questionnairesimage guided radiotherapypaediatricssurface guided radiotherapy

Identifiers

PMID38445717
PMCPMC11075983

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.