Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38445702›Full record

ArticleCurrent Alzheimer research2024

Multimodal Gamma Stimulation Improves Activity but not Memory in Aged Tgf344-AD Rats.

J H Bentley, J I Broussard

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Current Alzheimer research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 75% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

J H BentleyDepartment of Neurobiology and Anatomy, University of Texas McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
J I BroussardDepartment of Neurobiology and Anatomy, University of Texas McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX 77030, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7778-1747

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMultimodal sensory gamma stimulation is a treatment approach for Alzheimers disease that has been shown to improve pathology and memory in transgenic mouse models of Alzheimer's. Because rats are closer to humans in evolution, we tested the hypothesis that the transgenic rat line bearing human APP and PS1, line TgF344-AD, would be a good supplemental candidate to test the efficacy of this treatment. Current therapy approaches under investigation seek to utilize the immune response to minimize or degrade the accumulation of β-amyloid plaque load in mouse models designed to overexpress Aβ. However, many of these models lack some of the hallmarks of Alzheimer's disease, such as hyperphosphorylated tau and neuronal cell loss. The TgF344-AD transgenic rat model is a good candidate to bridge the gap between mouse models and clinical efficacy in humans.

objectiveThe objective of this study was to use multimodal gamma stimulation at light and auditory modalities simultaneously to test whether this enhances memory performance as measured by the object location task and the spontaneous alternation task.

methodsIn our study, we designed and built a low-cost, easy-to-construct multimodal light and sound gamma stimulator. Our gamma stimulation device was built using an Arduino microcontroller, which drives lights and a speaker at the gamma frequency. We have included in this paper our device's parts, hardware design, and software architecture for easy reproducibility. We then performed an experiment to test the effect of multimodal gamma stimulation on the cognitive performance of fourteen-month-old TgF344-AD rats. Rats were randomly assigned to either an experimental group that received gamma stimulation or a control group that did not. Performance in a Novel Object Location (NOL) task and spontaneous alternation task was evaluated in both groups before and after the treatment.

resultsMultimodal gamma stimulation did not improve memory compared to unstimulated TgF344-AD rats. However, the gamma-stimulated rats did spend significantly more time exploring objects in the novel location task than the unstimulated rats. In the spontaneous alternation task, gamma-stimulated rats exhibited significantly greater exploratory activity than unstimulated controls.

conclusionMultimodal gamma stimulation did not enhance memory performance in the object location task or the spontaneous alternation task. However, in both tasks, the treatment group had improved measures of exploratory activity relative to the untreated group. We conclude that several limitations could have contributed to this mixed effect, including aging complications, different animal models, or light cycle effects.

Indexed as

Acoustic StimulationAlzheimer DiseaseExploratory BehaviorGamma RhythmMemoryPhotic StimulationAmyloid beta-Protein PrecursorAnimalsFemaleRatsRats, TransgenicAmyloid beta-Protein PrecursorAPP protein, humanAlzheimer’s disease.gammamemoryNeuromodulationobject location taskspontaneous alternation dementia

Identifiers

PMID38445702
OpenAlexW4392517877

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.