Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38445693›Full record

ArticleProtein and peptide letters2024

Akshita Sharma, Bisma Butool, Pallavi Sahu, Reema Mishra, Aparajita Mohanty

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Protein and peptide letters, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Akshita SharmaDepartment of Botany, Gargi College, University of Delhi, Delhi, India.
Bisma ButoolDepartment of Botany, Gargi College, University of Delhi, Delhi, India.
Pallavi SahuDepartment of Botany, Gargi College, University of Delhi, Delhi, India.
Reema MishraDepartment of Botany, Gargi College, University of Delhi, Delhi, India.
Aparajita MohantyDepartment of Botany, Gargi College, University of Delhi, Delhi, India.
University of Delhi · IN

Funding

Department of Biotechnology, Ministry of Science and Technology, Government of India BT/PR40355/BID/7/970/2020
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFungal infections in plants, animals, and humans are widespread across the world. Limited classes of antifungal drugs to treat fungal infections and loss of drug efficacy due to rapidly evolving fungal strains pose a challenge in the agriculture and health sectors. Hence, the search for a new class of antifungal agents is imperative. Cyclotides are cyclic plant peptides with multiple bioactivities, including antifungal activity. They have six conserved cysteine residues forming three disulfide linkages (C

aimThis

objectiveThe objective of this study was to conduct METHODOLOGY: Cyclotide sequences assessed for antifungal activity were retrieved from the database (Cybase). Various online and offline tools were used for sequence-based studies, such as physicochemical parameters, sequence diversity, and neighbor-joining trees. Structure-based studies involving surface structure analysis and membrane-cyclotide interaction were also carried out. All investigations were conducted

resultsPhysicochemical parameter values,

conclusionThese

Indexed as

Antifungal AgentsCyclotidesFungiAmino Acid SequenceComputer SimulationMicrobial Sensitivity TestsPlant ProteinsAntifungal AgentsCyclotidesPlant ProteinsAntifungalcyclotidescycloviolacin O13cycloviolacin O2hydrophobic clustermembrane-cyclotide interactiontricyclon A.

Identifiers

PMID38445693
OpenAlexW4392518142

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.