Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38445551›Full record

ArticleHuman brain mapping2024

Data-driven MEG analysis to extract fMRI resting-state networks.

Esther A Pelzer, Abhinav Sharma, Esther Florin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human brain mapping, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Esther A PelzerInstitute of Clinical Neuroscience and Medical Psychology, Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Abhinav SharmaInstitute of Clinical Neuroscience and Medical Psychology, Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Esther FlorinInstitute of Clinical Neuroscience and Medical Psychology, Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8276-2508
Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf · DEMax Planck Institute for Metabolism Research · DE

Funding

Volkswagen Foundation 89387
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The electrophysiological basis of resting-state networks (RSN) is still under debate. In particular, no principled mechanism has been determined that is capable of explaining all RSN equally well. While magnetoencephalography (MEG) and electroencephalography are the methods of choice to determine the electrophysiological basis of RSN, no standard analysis pipeline of RSN yet exists. In this article, we compare the two main existing data-driven analysis strategies for extracting RSNs from MEG data and introduce a third approach. The first approach uses phase-amplitude coupling to determine the RSN. The second approach extracts RSN through an independent component analysis of the Hilbert envelope in different frequency bands, while the third new approach uses a singular value decomposition instead. To evaluate these approaches, we compare the MEG-RSN to the functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI)-RSN from the same subjects. Overall, it was possible to extract RSN with MEG using all three techniques, which matched the group-specific fMRI-RSN. Interestingly the new approach based on SVD yielded significantly higher correspondence to five out of seven fMRI-RSN than the two existing approaches. Importantly, with this approach, all networks-except for the visual network-had the highest correspondence to the fMRI networks within one frequency band. Thereby we provide further insights into the electrophysiological underpinnings of the fMRI-RSNs. This knowledge will be important for the analysis of the electrophysiological connectome.

Indexed as

ConnectomeMagnetoencephalographyElectroencephalographyHumansKnowledgeMagnetic Resonance ImagingEnvelope correlationfMRIICAMEGphase-amplitude coupling

Identifiers

PMID38445551
PMCPMC10915736
OpenAlexW4392510087

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.