ArticleEuropean heart journal. Cardiovascular Imaging2024
Impact of cardiac size on diagnostic performance of single-photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging: insights from the REgistry of Fast Myocardial Perfusion Imaging with NExt generation single-photon emission computed tomography.
Article in European heart journal. Cardiovascular Imaging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evaluation of Volumetric Reference Ranges for SPECT MPI Parameters and the Predictive Power of Dyssynchrony Parameters: A Cross-Sectional StudyCurrent medical imaging · 2026Article
- Relationship between left ventricular cavity size and transient ischaemic dilation ratio on dipyridamole stress single-photon emission computerized tomography myocardial perfusion imaging in a female Asian population.European heart journal. Imaging methods and practice · 2025Article
- Exosomal miRNA-21-5p and miRNA-21-3p as key biomarkers of myocardial infarction.Health science reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors at 10 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
Abstract
aimsVariation in diagnostic performance of single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) has been observed, yet the impact of cardiac size has not been well characterized. We assessed whether low left ventricular volume influences SPECT MPI's ability to detect obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) and its interaction with age and sex. METHODS AND
resultsA total of 2066 patients without known CAD (67% male, 64.7 ± 11.2 years) across nine institutions underwent SPECT MPI with solid-state scanners followed by coronary angiography as part of the REgistry of Fast Myocardial Perfusion Imaging with NExt Generation SPECT. Area under receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC) analyses evaluated the performance of quantitative and visual assessments according to cardiac size [end-diastolic volume (EDV); <20th vs. ≥20th population or sex-specific percentiles], age (<75 vs. ≥75 years), and sex. Significantly decreased performance was observed in patients with low EDV compared with those without (AUC: population 0.72 vs. 0.78, P = 0.03; sex-specific 0.72 vs. 0.79, P = 0.01) and elderly patients compared with younger patients (AUC 0.72 vs. 0.78, P = 0.03), whereas males and females demonstrated similar AUC (0.77 vs. 0.76, P = 0.67). The reduction in accuracy attributed to lower volumes was primarily observed in males (sex-specific threshold: EDV 0.69 vs. 0.79, P = 0.01). Accordingly, a significant decrease in AUC, sensitivity, specificity, and negative predictive value for quantitative and visual assessments was noted in patients with at least two characteristics of low EDV, elderly age, or male sex.
conclusionDetection of CAD with SPECT MPI is negatively impacted by small cardiac size, most notably in elderly and male patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.