ReviewLa Tunisie medicale2023
Review in La Tunisie medicale, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the era of genomics, orientation in the face of hereditary neutropenia still requires, first and foremost, a good clinical and cytological analysis. The thirty responsible genes now explain 60% of congenital neutropenia. These are rare since they are only found in 1‰ of all congenital neutropenia, estimated at 1% of the population. The clinical examination looks for phenotypes associated with syndromic hereditary neutropenia and cytology will guide this etiological research thanks to the data collected from blood count and bone marrow analysis. The objective of this narrative literature review is to provide an overview of the most recent literature regarding acquired and congenital chronic neutropenia and will provide a decision tree to guide towards aetiology. This will allow a better discussion with geneticists even if the genotype-phenotype correlation is not very strong.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38445418PMC11217964W4394765579What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.