ArticleLa Tunisie medicale
Article in La Tunisie medicale. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prevalence of low back pain-related disability in postpartum women in Slovakia.Wiener medizinische Wochenschrift (1946) · 2026Article
- Efficacy and mechanisms of lumbopelvic manipulation combined with Baduanjin exercise for postpartum low back pain: a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Factors influencing the intention to use Thai traditional medical postpartum care among pregnant and postpartum women in Bangkok: a cross-sectional study.BMC complementary medicine and therapies · 2025Article
- The Examination of the Relationship Between the Number of Births with the Symptoms of Urinary Incontinence and Low Back Pain Postpartum in Greek Women.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Evolution of treatment for unspecific back pain: From past to future.La Tunisie medicale · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionLow back pain (LBP) is common during pregnancy and tends to increase in the third trimester. This pregnancy-related condition may even persist through the postpartum period, and become a lifelong problem.
aimTo determine the prevalence of persistent LBP in the postpartum and to identify factors associated with this condition.
methodsIn this cross-sectional study, we assessed a survey of women under the age of 40 for back pain symptoms during the postpartum period. Questions included sociodemographic data, data related to low back pain during pregnancy and the postpartum period as well as characteristics of the delivery. We identified factors associated with persistent LBP in postpartum. The level of significance was fixed at 0.05.
resultsWe interviewed 100 women during their postpartum period. A history of LBP before and during pregnancy was found in 44.6% and 75% of cases respectively. In addition to pregnancy-related LBP, 53% experienced persistent postpartum LBP. A history of previous back pain episodes when not pregnant (p<0,001), as well as during previous pregnancies (p<0,001) were associated with persistent LBP. In contrast, no association was found between LBP in the postpartum and the number of children (p=0.681), body mass index (p=0.37), and physical activity (p=0.726). In multivariate analysis, we did not identify any associated factors for persistent LBP.
conclusionsOur study showed that the prevalence of persistent LBP in the postpartum is high. The main factors associated with this condition were previous episodes of back pain while non-pregnant or pregnant. Identification of these risk factors may help in the determination of appropriate prevention strategies and treatment options.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38445403PMC12558049W4394738456What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.