Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38445394›Full record

Observational studyBiomedical papers of the Medical Faculty of the University Palacky, Olomouc, Czechoslovakia2024

Comparison of dose length product and image quality of a biphasic whole-body polytrauma CT protocol with and without the automatic tube voltage selection.

David Girsa, Karin Kremenova, Jiri Lukavsky, Lucie Sukupova, Hana Malikova

Abstract readObservational StudyComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Biomedical papers of the Medical Faculty of the University Palacky, Olomouc, Czechoslovakia, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

David GirsaDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and Faculty Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady; Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.
Karin KremenovaDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and Faculty Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, Prague, Czech Republic.
Jiri LukavskyInstitute of Psychology, Czech Academy of Sciences, 110 00 Prague, Czech Republic; Department of Psychology, Faculty of Arts, Charles University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.
Lucie SukupovaDirector's Department, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic.
Hana MalikovaDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and Faculty Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady; Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsA significant source of man-made radiation is now linked to medical devices especially X-ray imaging based ones like CT scans which expose the body to cumulative ionizing radiation and thus attendant cancer risks. The aim of this study was to determine whether using a combination of Automatic Tube Current Modulation (ATCM) and Automatic Tube Voltage Selection (ATVS) during two-phase whole-body CT (2PWBCT) examinations would reduce the radiation dose while preserving the image quality. PATIENTS AND

methodsThis was a prospective, observational, single-centre study of 127 adult patients who had undergone the 2PWBCT polytraumatic protocol. All were examined on a Somatom Drive scanner (Siemens). The patients were divided into two groups: ATCM only (42 patients) and ATCM +ATVS (85 patients). Patients' arm positions during examination and the examination dose length product (DLP) values were recorded, as well the standard deviations (SD) of the density in reference areas on CT scans for the image quality assessment. The DLP values and image quality in the groups were compared using ANOVA.

resultsMean Total DLP (in mGy*cm): ATCM only: 3337 +/-797, ATCM+ATVS: 3402 +/-830; P=0.674. No effect of arm position (P=0.586). Mean density SD values in reference areas (in HU) in ATCM only: 49 +/-45, 15 +/-6, 9 +/-2, 12 +/-4, 10 +/-3, in ATCM+ATVS: 48 +/-45, 17 +/-6, 11 +/-3, 15 +/-6, 12 +/-4. SD values was higher in ATCM+ATVS group (P<0.001).

conclusionCombination of ATVS and ATCM in polytraumatic 2PWBCT leads to no significant radiation load reduction compared with ATCM only but does lead to a slight degradation of image quality. The radiation load is significantly reduced if the patient has their arms behind the head when scanning, regardless of the activation of ATVS.

Indexed as

Multiple TraumaRadiation DosageTomography, X-Ray ComputedWhole Body ImagingAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective Studiesautomatic tube current modulationautomatic tube voltage selectiondose length productpolytraumawhole body CT

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.