Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38445222›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.)2024

Comparison study of intraoperative surface acquisition methods on registration accuracy for soft-tissue surgical navigation.

Bowen Xiang, Jon S Heiselman, Winona L Richey, Michael I D'Angelica, Alice Wei, T Peter Kingham, Frankangel Servin, Kyvia Pereira, Sunil K Geevarghese, William R Jarnagin and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 95% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Comprehensive mixed reality surgical navigation system for liver surgery.Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Bowen XiangVanderbilt University, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Nashville, Tennessee, United States.
Jon S HeiselmanVanderbilt University, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Nashville, Tennessee, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4414-8846
Winona L RicheyVanderbilt University, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Nashville, Tennessee, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9697-4069
Michael I D'AngelicaMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Hepatopancreatobiliary Service, Department of Surgery, New York, New York, United States.
Alice WeiMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Hepatopancreatobiliary Service, Department of Surgery, New York, New York, United States.
T Peter KinghamMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Hepatopancreatobiliary Service, Department of Surgery, New York, New York, United States.
Frankangel ServinVanderbilt University, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Nashville, Tennessee, United States.
Kyvia PereiraVanderbilt University, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Nashville, Tennessee, United States.
Sunil K GeevargheseVanderbilt University Medical Center, Division of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Nashville, Tennessee, United States.
William R JarnaginMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Hepatopancreatobiliary Service, Department of Surgery, New York, New York, United States.
Michael I MigaVanderbilt University, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Nashville, Tennessee, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0694-9765
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USVanderbilt University · USVanderbilt University Medical Center · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Elisa de Stanchina · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Deformation Corrected Image Guided Laparoscopic Liver SurgeryR01EB027498 · NIBIB · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI JARNAGIN, WILLIAM ROBERT, MIGA, MICHAEL IAN · 2019 to 2022
$2.5M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB027498
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To study the difference between rigid registration and nonrigid registration using two forms of digitization (contact and noncontact) in human Approach: A Conoprobe device attachment and sterilization process was developed to enable prospective noncontact intraoperative acquisition of organ surface data in the operating room (OR). The noncontact Conoprobe digitization method was compared against stylus-based acquisition in the context of image-to-physical registration for image-guided surgical navigation. Data from Results: Surface data coverage collected by stylus and Conoprobe were Conclusion: The first use of a sterile-field amenable Conoprobe surface acquisition strategy in the OR is reported for open liver surgery. Under clinical conditions, the nonrigid registration significantly outperformed standard-of-care rigid registration, and acquisition by contact-based stylus and noncontact-based Conoprobe produced similar registration results. The accuracy benefits of noncontact surface acquisition with a Conoprobe are likely obscured by inferior data coverage and intrinsic noise within acquisition systems.

Indexed as

digitizationimage guidanceintraoperative ultrasoundlocalizationregistration

Identifiers

PMID38445222
PMCPMC10911768
OpenAlexW4392384111

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.