Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38445180›Full record

ArticleTechnical innovations & patient support in radiation oncology2024

Prospective evaluation of patient-reported anxiety and experiences with adaptive radiation therapy on an MR-linac.

Amanda Moreira, Winnie Li, Alejandro Berlin, Cathy Carpino-Rocca, Peter Chung, Leigh Conroy, Jennifer Dang, Laura A Dawson, Rachel M Glicksman, Ali Hosni and 11 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Technical innovations & patient support in radiation oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Evaluating participant experiences and tolerability with MR Linac imaging.Technical innovations & patient support in radiation oncology · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Amanda MoreiraRadiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.
Winnie LiRadiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.
Alejandro BerlinRadiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.
Cathy Carpino-RoccaRadiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.
Peter ChungRadiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.
Leigh ConroyRadiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.
Jennifer DangRadiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.
Laura A DawsonRadiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.
Rachel M GlicksmanRadiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.
Ali HosniRadiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.
Harald KellerRadiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.
Vickie KongRadiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.
Patricia LindsayRadiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.
Andrea ShesselRadiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.
Teo StanescuRadiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.
Edward TaylorRadiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.
Jeff WinterRadiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.
Michael YanRadiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.
Daniel LetourneauRadiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.
Michael MilosevicRadiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.
Michael VelecRadiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.
University Health Network · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: An integrated magnetic resonance scanner and linear accelerator (MR-linac) was implemented with daily online adaptive radiation therapy (ART). This study evaluated patient-reported experiences with their overall hospital care as well as treatment in the MR-linac environment. Methods: Patients pre-screened for MR eligibility and claustrophobia were referred to simulation on a 1.5 T MR-linac. Patient-reported experience measures were captured using two validated surveys. The 15-item MR-anxiety questionnaire (MR-AQ) was administered immediately after the first treatment to rate MR-related anxiety and relaxation. The 40-item satisfaction with cancer care questionnaire rating doctors, radiation therapists, the services and care organization and their outpatient experience was administered immediately after the last treatment using five-point Likert responses. Results were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Results: 205 patients were included in this analysis. Multiple sites were treated across the pelvis and abdomen with a median treatment time per fraction of 46 and 66 min respectively. Patients rated MR-related anxiety as "not at all" (87%), "somewhat" (11%), "moderately" (1%) and "very much so" (1%). Positive satisfaction responses ranged from 78 to 100% (median 93%) across all items. All radiation therapist-specific items were rated positively as 96-100%. The five lowest rated items (range 78-85%) were related to general provision of information, coordination, and communication. Overall hospital care was rated positively at 99%. Conclusion: In this large, single-institution prospective cohort, all patients had low MR-related anxiety and completed treatment as planned despite lengthy ART treatments with the MR-linac. Patients overall were highly satisfied with their cancer care involving ART using an MR-linac.

Indexed as

Adaptive radiotherapyAnxietyMR-linacPatient experience

Identifiers

PMID38445180
PMCPMC10912905
OpenAlexW4392184709

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.