Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38445177›Full record

ArticleMethodsX2024

Method for phase space reconstruction to estimate the short-term future behavior of pressure signals in pipelines.

Edgar Orlando Ladino-Moreno, César Augusto García-Ubaque, Eduardo Zamudio-Huertas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in MethodsX, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Edgar Orlando Ladino-MorenoUniversidad Distrital Francisco José de Caldas, Bogotá, Colombia.
César Augusto García-UbaqueUniversidad Distrital Francisco José de Caldas, Bogotá, Colombia.
Eduardo Zamudio-HuertasUniversidad Distrital Francisco José de Caldas, Bogotá, Colombia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this study, we propose a method based on phase space reconstruction to estimate the short-term future behavior of pressure signals in pipelines. The pressure time series data were obtained from an IoT experimental model conducted in the laboratory. The proposed hydraulic system demonstrated the presence of traces of weak chaos in the time series of the pressure signal. Fractal dimension analysis revealed a complex fractal structure in the data, indicating the existence of nonlinear dynamics. Similarly, Lyapunov coefficients, divergent trajectories, and autocorrelation analysis confirmed the presence of weak chaos in the time series. The results demonstrated the existence of apparently chaotic patterns that follow the theory proposed by Kolmogorov for deterministic dynamic systems that exhibit apparently random behaviors. Phase space reconstruction allowed us to show the dynamic characteristics of the signal so that short-term predictions were stable. Finally, the study of strange attractors in pipeline pressure time series can have significant contributions to anomaly detection.•A methodology is proposed for the reconstruction of the phase space to estimate the short-term future behavior of pressure signals in pipelines in real time.•The analysis of the proposed hydraulic system revealed some indications of weak chaos in the time series of the pressure signal obtained experimentally.•The methodology implemented and the results of this study showed that the short-term predictions were very accurate and consistent; Chaotic patterns were also identified that support the theory proposed by Kolmogorov.

Indexed as

ArduinoChaosIoTMethod phase space reconstructionPhase space reconstructionSignalsTransients in pipelines

Identifiers

PMID38445177
PMCPMC10912665

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.