Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38445137›Full record

ArticleCureus2024

Pain Intensity of Skeletally Anchored Maxillary Molar Distalization in Conjunction with Micro-osteoperforations: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Abdallah Mohammed Bahaa El-Din, Khaled Abd El Khaliq Hendy, Raafat Elghetany Mohamed, Ahmed Abouelnour, Mohamed Mohamed Ali, Ahmed Akram El-Awady, Farouk Ahmed Hussein

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Abdallah Mohammed Bahaa El-DinDepartment of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dental Medicine (Boys), Al-Azhar University, Cairo, EGY.
Khaled Abd El Khaliq HendyDepartment of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dental Medicine (Boys), Al-Azhar University, Cairo, EGY.
Raafat Elghetany MohamedDepartment of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dental Medicine (Boys), Al-Azhar University, Cairo, EGY.
Ahmed AbouelnourDepartment of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dental Medicine (Boys), Al-Azhar University, Cairo, EGY.
Mohamed Mohamed AliDepartment of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dental Medicine (Boys), Al-Azhar University, Cairo, EGY.
Ahmed Akram El-AwadyDepartment of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dental Medicine (Boys), Al-Azhar University, Cairo, EGY.
Farouk Ahmed HusseinDepartment of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dental Medicine (Boys), Al-Azhar University, Cairo, EGY.
Al-Azhar University · ID

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective To assess pain intensity levels during orthodontic therapy of Class II malocclusion patients undergoing skeletally anchored maxillary molar distalization assisted with different micro-osteoperforation (MOP) approaches. Methods Twenty-seven patients (12 males and 18 females) with a mean age of 16.1 ± 0.3 years were randomized into three equal groups (n=9): Group 1 comprised MOPs on buccal surface, Group 2 comprised MOPs on buccal and palatal surface, and Group 3 comprised the control or no-MOP group. The patients underwent maxillary molar distalization using skeletally anchored distal jet appliance assisted with or without MOPs. The MOPs were applied repeatedly on the buccal and buccal and palatal sides, or no MOP (control). Pain intensity was assessed using a 10 cm visual analog scale after each device activation at 24, 48, 72 hours, and at seven days. Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA and repeated measures ANOVA for non-paired and paired means. Results Both approaches of buccal and buccal and palatal application of MOPs showed statistically significant (p< 0.01) higher levels of pain intensity after the first activation at 24 hours. Nevertheless, pain intensity levels decreased significantly in both MOP groups and between the two activations. Conclusion The repeated application of MOPs on either the buccal side only or on both buccal and palatal sides during maxillary molar distalization did not affect the levels of pain experienced; however, these levels were reported to be higher than that obtained in the control group. Moreover, it is observed that these pain levels tend to gradually reduce to mild levels over the subsequent days.

Indexed as

class ii malocclusiondistal jetmicro-osteoperforationmolar distalizationpain

Identifiers

PMID38445137
PMCPMC10912477
OpenAlexW4391521479

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.