ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2024
Untargeted urine metabolomics and machine learning provide potential metabolic signatures in children with autism spectrum disorder.
Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Machine learning model to identify gut microbiome-derived metabolites as potential biomarkers of autism spectrum disorder: a pilot study.BMC psychiatry · 2026Article
- The role of machine learning in autism spectrum disorder assessment and management.Pediatric research · 2025Review
- Hypometabolism in Autism Spectrum Disorder: Insights from Brain and Blood Transcriptomics.Molecular neurobiology · 2025Article
- Cerebrospinal fluid metabolomics in autistic regression reveals dysregulation of sphingolipids and decreased β-hydroxybutyrate.EBioMedicine · 2025Article
- Prostaglandins: Biological Action, Therapeutic Aspects, and Pathophysiology of Autism Spectrum Disorders.Current issues in molecular biology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Complementary to traditional biostatistics, the integration of untargeted urine metabolomic profiling with Machine Learning (ML) has the potential to unveil metabolic profiles crucial for understanding diseases. However, the application of this approach in autism remains underexplored. Our objective was to delve into the metabolic profiles of autism utilizing a comprehensive untargeted metabolomics platform coupled with ML. Methods: Untargeted metabolomics quantification (UHPLC/Q-TOF-MS) was performed for urine analysis. Feature selection was conducted using Lasso regression, and logistic regression, support vector machine, random forest, and extreme gradient boosting were utilized for significance stratification. Pathway enrichment analysis was performed to identify metabolic pathways associated with autism. Results: A total of 52 autistic children and 40 typically developing children were enrolled. Lasso regression identified ninety-two urinary metabolites that significantly differed between the two groups. Distinct metabolites, such as prostaglandin E2, phosphonic acid, lysine, threonine, and phenylalanine, were revealed to be associated with autism through the application of four different ML methods (p<0.05). The alterations observed in the phosphatidylinositol and inositol phosphate metabolism pathways were linked to the pathophysiology of autism (p<0.05). Conclusion: Significant urinary metabolites, including prostaglandin E2, phosphonic acid, lysine, threonine, and phenylalanine, exhibit associations with autism. Additionally, the involvement of the phosphatidylinositol and inositol phosphate pathways suggests their potential role in the pathophysiology of autism.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.