ArticleAnnals of thoracic medicine
Risk factors for discontinuing intravenous patient-controlled analgesia after thoracic surgery.
Article in Annals of thoracic medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy of fentanyl combined with bupivacaine and morphine for spinal anesthesia during cesarean section: A double-blind randomized controlled trial.The Journal of international medical research · 2025Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis study examined the risk factors of experiencing side effects from using intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (IV PCA) following lung and esophageal surgery.
methodsOur study included adult patients who underwent lung or esophageal surgery and received IV PCA for postoperative acute pain control between 2020 and 2022. We collected information on side effects from IV PCA use, the decision to discontinue PCA, and the PCA regimen from the daily reports of the acute pain management team and verified the accuracy using electronic records from ward nurses. The primary outcome was the risk factor associated with discontinuing IV PCA due to its side effects.
resultsOut of the 1796 patients in our study, 1795 used PCA containing opioids; 196 patients stopped IV PCA due to unbearable side effects. Being female (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 2.65, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.70, 4.13) was linked to a higher chance of stopping PCA use. Having hypertension (aOR: 0.46, 95% CI: 0.26, 0.81) and being classified as the American Society of Anesthesiologists class 3 or higher (aOR: 0.48, 95% CI: 0.23, 0.86) were associated with a lower chance of discontinuing PCA use.
conclusionOur study determined the risk factors to stop using IV PCA due to side effects following lung or esophageal surgery. These results emphasize the need for personalized pain management plans that take into account the patient's characteristics and the type of surgery performed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.