Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38444959›Full record

ReviewSeminars in plastic surgery2023

Robotics in Microsurgery and Supermicrosurgery.

Heather R Burns, Alexandra McLennan, Erica Y Xue, Jessie Z Yu, Jesse C Selber

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Seminars in plastic surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Short-term outcomes of robotic versus conventional unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: evidence from a national database.Journal of orthopaedics and traumatology : official journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Ischial Pressure Ulcer Reconstruction: A Critical Review of the Paradigm Shift From Wound Coverage to Functional Restoration.Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Heather R BurnsDivision of Plastic Surgery, Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.
Alexandra McLennanDivision of Plastic Surgery, Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.
Erica Y XueDivision of Plastic Surgery, Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.
Jessie Z YuDepartment of Plastic Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Jesse C SelberDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Corewell Health, Grand Rapids, Michigan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microsurgery has changed the ability to perform highly precise and technical surgeries through the utilization of high-powered microscopes and specialized instruments to manipulate and repair anatomical structures as small as a few millimeters. Since the first human trials of robotic-assisted microsurgery in 2006, the expansion of microsurgery to supermicrosurgery (luminal diameter less than 1 mm) has enabled successful repair of previously inaccessible structures. Surgical robotic systems can offer two distinct operative advantages: (1) minimal access surgery-by entering body cavities through ports, flap harvest can be redesigned to affect a minimally invasive approach for flaps such as the rectus abdominis muscle, the latissimus flap, and the deep inferior epigastric perforator flap; and (2) precision-by eliminating physiologic tremor, improving ergonomics, increasing accessibility to difficult spaces, and providing motion scaling, precision is significantly enhanced. Robotic-assisted microsurgery is a promising application of robotics for the plastic surgeon and has played an important role in flap harvest, head and neck reconstruction, nerve reconstruction, gender-affirming surgery, and lymphatic reconstruction-all the while minimizing surgical morbidity. This article aims to review the history, technology, and application of microsurgery and supermicrosurgery in plastic surgery.

Indexed as

robotic breast reconstructionrobotic microsurgeryrobotic plastic surgerysupermicrosurgery

Identifiers

PMID38444959
PMCPMC10911899

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.