Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38444887›Full record

ArticlePhysics and imaging in radiation oncology2024

Setup and intra-fractional motion measurements using surface scanning in head and neck cancer radiotherapy- A feasibility study.

Marion Essers, Lennart Mesch, Maaike Beugeling, Janita Dekker, Willy de Kruijf

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physics and imaging in radiation oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Marion EssersInstitute Verbeeten, Medical Physics & Instrumentation, PO Box 90120, 5000 LA Tilburg, the Netherlands.
Lennart MeschInstitute Verbeeten, Radiotherapy, PO Box 90120, 5000 LA Tilburg, the Netherlands.
Maaike BeugelingInstitute Verbeeten, Radiotherapy, PO Box 90120, 5000 LA Tilburg, the Netherlands.
Janita DekkerInstitute Verbeeten, Medical Physics & Instrumentation, PO Box 90120, 5000 LA Tilburg, the Netherlands.
Willy de KruijfInstitute Verbeeten, Medical Physics & Instrumentation, PO Box 90120, 5000 LA Tilburg, the Netherlands.
Instituut Verbeeten · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and purpose: Surface-guided radiotherapy (SGRT) is applied to improve patient set-up and to monitor intra-fraction motion. Head and neck cancer (H&N) patients are usually fixated using 5-point thermoplastic masks, that are experienced as uncomfortable or even stressful. Therefore, the feasibility of irradiating H&N patients without a mask by using SGRT was examined. Material and methods: Nineteen H&N patients were included in a simulation study. Once a week, before the standard treatment, a maskless treatment was simulated, using SGRT for setup and intrafraction motion monitoring. Initial patient setup accuracy and intrafraction motion was determined using ConeBeam CT (CBCT) images as well as SGRT before and after the (simulated) treatment. The clinical target volume to planning target volume (CTV-PTV) margin for intrafraction motion was calculated. Using patient questionnaires, the patient-friendliness H&N irradiation with and without mask was determined. Results: Maskless setup with SGRT and CBCT was as accurate as with a mask. SGRT showed that intrafraction motion was gradual during the treatment. The CTV-PTV margin correcting for intrafraction motion was 1.7 mm for maskless treatment without interventions, and 1.2 mm if corrected for motions > 2 mm. For 19 % of fractions, the intrafraction motion, as detected by both SGRT and CBCT, was larger than 2 mm in at least one direction. Sixteen patients preferred maskless treatment, while 3 worried they would move too much. Conclusions: Using SGRT and a standard head rest resulted in a patient-friendly treatment with accurate patient setup and acceptably small intrafraction motion for H&N patients.

Indexed as

Cone-beam computed tomographyHead and neck cancerIntrafraction motion monitoringMasklessPatient positioningSurface-guided radiotherapy

Identifiers

PMID38444887
PMCPMC10912619
OpenAlexW4392142218

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.