Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38444875›Full record

ArticleContemporary clinical trials communications2024

Effects of power training in older patients with multiple sclerosis on neurodegeneration, neuromuscular function, and physical function. A study protocol for the "power training in older multiple sclerosis patients (PoTOMS) randomized control trial.

Tobias Gaemelke, Christoffer Laustsen, Peter Feys, Lars Folkestad, Marianne Skovsager Andersen, Niklas Rye Jørgensen, Marie-Louise Jørgensen, Sune Nørhøj Jespersen, Steffen Ringgaard, Simon F Eskildsen and 2 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Contemporary clinical trials communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04762342 (Power Training in Older Multiple Sclerosis Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04762342 naunknown statusnot on this map

Power Training in Older Multiple Sclerosis Patients

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of AarhusRan2020 to 2024Enrolled60ConditionsMultiple Sclerosis, Sclerosis, Demyelinating Autoimmune Diseases, CNS, Autoimmune Diseases of the Nervous SystemArmsPower training
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Tobias GaemelkeExercise Biology, Department of Public Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Christoffer LaustsenThe MR Research Center, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Peter FeysREVAL, Rehabilitation Research Center, BIOMED, Biomedical Research Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Life Sciences, Hasselt University, Hasselt, Belgium.
Lars FolkestadDepartment of Endocrinology, Odense University Hospital and University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Marianne Skovsager AndersenDepartment of Endocrinology, Odense University Hospital and University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Niklas Rye JørgensenDepartment of Clinical Biochemistry, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Marie-Louise JørgensenSchool of Applied Sciences, Business Academy Aarhus, Aarhus, Denmark.
Sune Nørhøj JespersenDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Steffen RinggaardThe MR Research Center, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Simon F EskildsenCenter of Functionally Integrative Neuroscience and MINDLab, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Ulrik DalgasExercise Biology, Department of Public Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Lars G HvidExercise Biology, Department of Public Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Aarhus University · DKUniversity of Southern Denmark · DKBusiness Academy Aarhus · DKHasselt University · BEUniversity of Copenhagen · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Approximately one-third of all persons with multiple sclerosis (pwMS) are older, i.e., having an age ≥60 years. Whilst ageing and MS separately elicit deteriorating effects on brain morphology, neuromuscular function, and physical function, the combination of ageing and MS may pose a particular challenge. To counteract such detrimental changes, power training (i.e., a type of resistance exercise focusing on moderate-to-high loading at maximal intended movement velocity) presents itself as a viable and highly effective solution. Power training is known to positively impact physical function, neuromuscular function, as well as brain morphology. Existing evidence is promising but limited to young and middle-aged pwMS, with the effects of power training remaining to be elucidated in older pwMS. Methods: The presented 'Power Training in Older MS patients (PoTOMS)' trial is a national, multi-center, parallel-group, randomized controlled trial. The trial compares 24 weeks of usual care(n = 30) to 24 weeks of usual care and power training (n = 30). The primary outcome is whole brain atrophy rate. The secondary outcomes include changes in brain micro and macro structures, neuromuscular function, physical function, cognitive function, bone health, and patient-reported outcomes. Ethics and dissemination: The presented study is approved by The Regional Ethics Committee (reference number 1-10-72-222-20) and registered at the Danish Data Protection Agency (reference number 2016-051-000001). All study findings will be published in scientific peer-reviewed journals and presented at relevant scientific conferences independent of the results. The www.clinicaltrials.gov identifier is NCT04762342.

Indexed as

agingMultiple sclerosisneuroprotectionresistance exercise

Identifiers

PMID38444875
PMCPMC10912361
OpenAlexW4391933760

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.