Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38444836›Full record

ArticleSouthern African journal of HIV medicine2024

Retrospective review of maternal HIV viral load electronic gatekeeping codes in South Africa.

Siphesihle K Mahanjana, Tladi Ledibane, Gayle G Sherman, Tanya Y Murray, Ahmad F Haeri Mazanderani

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Southern African journal of HIV medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 97% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Siphesihle K MahanjanaDepartment of Public Health Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, School of Medicine, Sefako Makgatho Health Sciences University, Pretoria, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-5002-7686
Tladi LedibaneDepartment of Public Health Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, School of Medicine, Sefako Makgatho Health Sciences University, Pretoria, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4432-9479
Gayle G ShermanCentre for HIV and STIs, National Institute for Communicable Diseases, Division of National Health Laboratory Service, Johannesburg, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3208-5216
Tanya Y MurrayCentre for HIV and STIs, National Institute for Communicable Diseases, Division of National Health Laboratory Service, Johannesburg, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8928-0074
Ahmad F Haeri MazanderaniCentre for HIV and STIs, National Institute for Communicable Diseases, Division of National Health Laboratory Service, Johannesburg, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7644-153X
National Health Laboratory Service · ZASefako Makgatho Health Sciences University · ZA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Maternal electronic gatekeeping (eGK) codes for HIV viral load (VL) testing of pregnant and breastfeeding women were developed to permit increased frequency of maternal HIV VL testing without automated gatekeeping cancellation, and to enable virological surveillance. Objectives: This study describes the national uptake of maternal eGK codes and VL suppression (VLS) rates disaggregated by age during antenatal, delivery and postnatal periods in South Africa during 2022. Method: HIV VL tests associated with C#PMTCT (used for antenatal and postnatal testing) and C#DELIVERY (used at delivery) eGK codes between 01 January and 31 December 2022, were extracted from the National Institute for Communicable Diseases Data Warehouse. Uptake of eGK codes was calculated using indicators from the District Health Information System as denominators while HIV VLS rates (< 1000 copies/mL) were calculated as monthly and annual percentages. Results: Overall, national maternal eGK code uptake was 41.8%, 24.5% and 0.12% for the antenatal, delivery and postnatal periods, respectively. The monthly antenatal eGK uptake increased from 27.5% to 58.5% while delivery uptake increased from 17.3% to 30.0%. The overall annual maternal HIV VLS rate was 86.7% antenatally and 87.2% during delivery. The monthly average HIV VLS for adolescent girls and young women (AGYW) was 76.1% antenatally and 79.6% during delivery. Conclusion: Although overall national uptake of maternal HIV VL eGK codes was low, antenatal and delivery uptake improved over time, thereby facilitating use of eGK codes for programmatic monitoring of maternal VLS rates for the first time. Quality of care among pregnant AGYW requires urgent attention.

Indexed as

electronic gatekeeping codesmaternal HIVsurveillancevertical transmission preventionviral load

Identifiers

PMID38444836
PMCPMC10913175
OpenAlexW4392001930

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.