Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38444619›Full record

ArticleEngineering in life sciences2024

Automized inline monitoring in perfused mammalian cell culture by MIR spectroscopy without calibration model building.

Hannah Marienberg, Nicole Desch, Vitalii Mozin, Lorenz Sykora-Mirle, Anja Müller, Andreas Roth, Mathias Käfer, Rüdiger Neef

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Engineering in life sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Hannah MarienbergIRUBIS GmbH Munich Germany.
Nicole DeschAmgen Research (Munich) GmbH Munich Germany.
Vitalii MozinIRUBIS GmbH Munich Germany.
Lorenz Sykora-MirleIRUBIS GmbH Munich Germany.
Anja MüllerIRUBIS GmbH Munich Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-1145-8949
Andreas RothIRUBIS GmbH Munich Germany.
Mathias KäferAmgen Research (Munich) GmbH Munich Germany.
Rüdiger NeefAmgen Research (Munich) GmbH Munich Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Process Analytical Technologies (PATs) are taking a key role in the run for automatization in the biopharmaceutical industry. Spectroscopic methods such as Raman spectroscopy or mid-infrared (MIR) spectroscopy are getting more recognition in the recent years for inline monitoring of bioprocesses due to their ability to measure various molecules simultaneously. However, their dependency on laborious model calibration making them a challenge to implement. In this study, a novel one-point calibration that requires a single reference point prior to the inline monitoring of glucose and lactate in bioprocesses with MIR spectroscopy is assessed with 22 mammalian cell perfusion (PER) processes in two different scales and four different products. Concentrations are predicted over all PERs runs with a root mean square error (RMSE) of 0.29 g/L for glucose and 0.24 g/L for lactate, respectively. For comparison conventional partial least square regression (PLSR) models were used and trained with spectroscopic data from six bioreactor runs in two different scales and three products. The general accuracy of those models (RMSE of 0.41 g/L for glucose and 0.16 g/L for lactate) are in the range of the accuracy of the one-point calibration. This shows the potential of the one-point calibration as an approach making spectroscopy more accessible for bioprocess development.

Indexed as

analyticsCHOMIRPATperfusionspectroscopy

Identifiers

PMID38444619
PMCPMC10910268

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.