ArticleHeliyon2024
Pulmonary flow-study can predict in-hospital prognosis of unifocalization and corrective repair of pulmonary atresia/ventricular septal defect with major aortopulmonary collateral arteries.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: With the development of perioperative treatment, the results of the unifocalization and corrective repair of pulmonary atresia/ventricular septal defect with major aortopulmonary collateral arteries have been significantly improved. However, the in-hospital recovery is quite different individually. Therefore, it is essential to find prognostic indicators to avoid unsatisfactory recovery. Design: This was a case-control study. Setting: The study was conducted in the national center for cardiovascular diseases in China. Participants: Pediatric patients between 2014 and 2022. Interventions: None. Measurements & main results: A total of 19 patients were included. The possible prognostic indicators included were commonly used clinical data. Unsatisfactory postoperative recovery was defined as mechanical ventilation≥ 7 days and/or in-hospital death. Satisfactory postoperative recovery was defined as mechanical ventilation<7 days and survival at discharge. We separated patients into two groups and compared the peri-operative data through univariable analysis. There were 8 patients in unsatisfactory recovery group (including 1 death) and 11 patients in satisfactory recovery group. Among all the possible prognostic indicators, through univariable analysis, pulmonary arterial pressure in pulmonary flow study was statistically different (p = 0.027 < 0.05). The ROC curve showed that the area under curve and cut-off values in predicting satisfactory recovery were 0.841 and 22 mmHg; the corresponding sensitivity and specificity were 100% and 72.7%. There was no statistical difference between the two groups in ventricular septal fenestration and pulmonary hypertension targeting drugs. Conclusion: A pulmonary arterial pressure <22 mmHg in pulmonary flow study may avoid unsatisfactory in-hospital recovery after unifocalization and corrective repair of pulmonary atresia/ventricular septal defect with major aortopulmonary collateral arteries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.