ArticleFrontiers in medicine2024
Evaluating the impact of interprofessional training wards on patient satisfaction and clinical outcomes: a mixed-methods analysis.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Relationship Between Patients' Perceived Quality of Nursing Students' Caring Behaviors and Patient Satisfaction in Iran: A Cross-Sectional Study.Health science reports · 2026Article
- Implementation and effectiveness of an interprofessional educational intervention on patient safety in perinatal care: a multi-method, prospective evaluation study.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Which Factors Promote Interprofessional Competence in Placements on a Training Ward? New Findings.Medical science educator · 2026Article
- Evaluation of a learning module on team competencies in medicine utilizing simulation-based scenarios.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Patient-related outcome measures in medical education research.GMS journal for medical education · 2026Article
- An Interprofessional Training Ward in Pediatric Cardiology: Ensuring Patient Safety and Results from the Evaluation of Patient and Parent Satisfaction.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Communication on Rounds: The Role of Rounds Culture and Communication in Patient Care and Teaching.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2025Review
- Interprofessional Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Piperacillin/Tazobactam Enhances Care for Patients with Acute-on-Chronic Liver Failure in the ICU: A Retrospective Observational Pilot Study.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Cost-effectiveness in an interprofessional training ward within a university department for internal medicine: a monocentric open-label controlled study of the A-STAR Regensburg.Frontiers in public health · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Interprofessional teamwork is pivotal in modern healthcare, prompting the establishment of interprofessional training wards since 1996. While these wards serve as hubs for optimizing healthcare professional collaboration and communication, research into patient outcomes remains notably sparse and geographically limited, predominantly examining patient satisfaction and sparingly exploring other metrics like mortality or self-discharge rates. This study seeks to bridge this gap, comparing patient outcomes in interprofessional training wards and conventional wards under the hypothesis that the former offers no disadvantage to patient outcomes. Materials and methods: We explored patient outcomes within an interprofessional student ward called A-STAR at a University Hospital from October 2019 to December 2022. Engaging with patients discharged between May 2021 and April 2022, we utilized digital and paper-based anonymous questionnaires, catering to patient preference, to gather pertinent data. Results: Analysis of outcomes for 1,482 A-STAR (interprofessional student ward) and 5,752 conventional ward patients revealed noteworthy findings. A-STAR patients tended to be younger (59 vs. 61 years, Discussion: This data collectively underscores the safety and reliability of patient care within training wards, affirming that patients can trust the care provided in these settings. Patients on the interprofessional ward demonstrated high satisfaction levels: 96.7% appreciated the atmosphere and conduct of ward rounds. In comparison, 98.3% were satisfied with the discussion and information about their treatment during their hospital stay.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.