Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38444337›Full record

SynthesisProceedings. Biological sciences2024

Predators control pests and increase yield across crop types and climates: a meta-analysis.

Gabriel X Boldorini, Matthew A Mccary, Gustavo Q Romero, Kirby L Mills, Nathan J Sanders, Peter B Reich, Radek Michalko, Thiago Gonçalves-Souza

Open access · greenAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
15.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Gabriel X BoldoriniDepartment of Biology, Ecological Synthesis and Biodiversity Conservation Lab, Federal Rural University of Pernambuco, Recife, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-7581-9043
Matthew A MccaryDepartment of BioSciences, Rice University, Houston, TX 77005, USA.
Gustavo Q RomeroDepartment of Animal Biology, Institute of Biology, State University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil.
Kirby L MillsDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7693-9629
Nathan J SandersDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6220-6731
Peter B ReichInstitute for Global Change Biology, School for Environment and Sustainability, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Radek MichalkoDepartment of Forest Ecology, Faculty of Forestry and Wood Technology, Mendel University in Brno, Zemědělská 3, 613 00 Brno, Czech Republic.
Thiago Gonçalves-SouzaDepartment of Biology, Ecological Synthesis and Biodiversity Conservation Lab, Federal Rural University of Pernambuco, Recife, Brazil.
University of Michigan · USMendel University in Brno · CZRice University · USUniversidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) · BRUniversidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco · BRUniversity of Minnesota · US

Funding

CNPq-Brazil research grantFACEPE fellowshipSão Paulo Research Foundation
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pesticides have well-documented negative consequences to control crop pests, and natural predators are alternatives and can provide an ecosystem service as biological control agents. However, there remains considerable uncertainty regarding whether such biological control can be a widely applicable solution, especially given ongoing climatic variation and climate change. Here, we performed a meta-analysis focused on field studies with natural predators to explore broadly whether and how predators might control pests and in turn increase yield. We also contrasted across studies pest suppression by a single and multiple predators and how climate influence biological control. Predators reduced pest populations by 73% on average, and increased crop yield by 25% on average. Surprisingly, the impact of predators did not depend on whether there were many or a single predator species. Precipitation seasonality was a key climatic influence on biological control: as seasonality increased, the impact of predators on pest populations increased. Taken together, the positive contribution of predators in controlling pests and increasing yield, and the consistency of such responses in the face of precipitation variability, suggest that biocontrol has the potential to be an important part of pest management and increasing food supplies as the planet precipitation patterns become increasingly variable.

Indexed as

EcosystemPesticidesClimate ChangeUncertaintyPesticidesbiocontrolbiological controlnatural enemiesnatural predatorspest controlresident agents

Identifiers

PMID38444337
PMCPMC10915543
OpenAlexW4392516617

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.