Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38444335›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2024

Behavioural consequences of intraspecific variability in a mate recognition signal.

Maximilian Steurer, Joachim Ruther, Tamara Pokorny

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Maximilian SteurerInstitute of Zoology, University of Regensburg, Universitätsstrasse 31, 93053 Regensburg, Germany.ORCID 0009-0006-3925-6603
Joachim RutherInstitute of Zoology, University of Regensburg, Universitätsstrasse 31, 93053 Regensburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1295-347X
Tamara PokornyInstitute of Zoology, University of Regensburg, Universitätsstrasse 31, 93053 Regensburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8183-9638
University of Regensburg · DE

Funding

German Research Foundation
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mate recognition is paramount for sexually reproducing animals, and many insects rely on cuticular hydrocarbons (CHCs) for close-range sexual communication. To ensure reliable mate recognition, intraspecific sex pheromone variability should be low. However, CHCs can be influenced by several factors, with the resulting variability potentially impacting sexual communication. While intraspecific CHC variability is a common phenomenon, the consequences thereof for mate recognition remain largely unknown. We investigated the effect of CHC variability on male responses in a parasitoid wasp showing a clear-cut within-population CHC polymorphism (three distinct female chemotypes, one thereof similar to male profiles). Males clearly discriminated between female and male CHCs, but not between female chemotypes in no-choice assays. When given a choice, a preference hierarchy emerged. Interestingly, the most attractive chemotype was the one most similar to male profiles. Mixtures of female CHCs were as attractive as chemotype-pure ones, while a female-male mixture negatively impacted male responses, indicating assessment of the entire, complex CHC profile composition. Our study reveals that the evaluation of CHC profiles can be strict towards 'undesirable' features, but simultaneously tolerant enough to cover a range of variants. This reconciles reliable mate recognition with naturally occurring variability.

Indexed as

ReproductionSex AttractantsAnimalsCommunicationFemaleMalePolymorphism, GeneticRecognition, PsychologySex Attractantscuticular hydrocarbonsmate preferenceparasitoid waspsex pheromoneTachinaephagus zealandicusvariation

Identifiers

PMID38444335
PMCPMC10915540
OpenAlexW4392516688

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.