Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38444306›Full record

ArticleAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany)2024

A Neutrophil Hijacking Nanoplatform Reprograming NETosis for Targeted Microglia Polarizing Mediated Ischemic Stroke Treatment.

Na Yin, Wenya Wang, Fei Pei, Yuzhen Zhao, Changhua Liu, Mingming Guo, Kaixiang Zhang, Zhenzhong Zhang, Jinjin Shi, Yun Zhang and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
8.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Na YinSchool of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, 450001, China.
Wenya WangSchool of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, 450001, China.
Fei PeiSchool of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, 450001, China.
Yuzhen ZhaoSchool of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, 450001, China.
Changhua LiuSchool of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, 450001, China.
Mingming GuoSchool of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, 450001, China.
Kaixiang ZhangSchool of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, 450001, China.
Zhenzhong ZhangSchool of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, 450001, China.
Jinjin ShiSchool of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, 450001, China.ORCID 0000-0003-1531-7265
Yun ZhangSchool of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, 450001, China.
Zhi-Hao WangSchool of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, 450001, China.
Junjie LiuSchool of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, 450001, China.
Zhengzhou University · CN

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 81972907National Natural Science Foundation of China 82073395National Natural Science Foundation of China 82073787National Natural Science Foundation of China 82171333National Natural Science Foundation of China 82222067Outstanding Youth Foundation of Henan Province Henan 222300420020Postdoctoral Science Foundation of China 2020TQ0288Postdoctoral Science Foundation of China 2021M690140
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Precise and efficient regulation of microglia is vital for ischemic stroke therapy and prognosis. The infiltration of neutrophils into the brain provides opportunities for regulatory drugs across the blood-brain barrier, while hindered by neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) and targeted delivery of intracerebral drugs to microglia. This study reports an efficient neutrophil hijacking nanoplatform (referred to as APTS) for targeted A151 (a telomerase repeat sequence) delivery to microglia without the generation of NETs. In the middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO) mouse model, the delivery efficiency to ischemic stroke tissues increases by fourfold. APTS dramatically reduces the formation of NETs by 2.2-fold via reprogramming NETosis to apoptosis in neutrophils via a reactive oxygen species scavenging-mediated citrullinated histone 3 inhibition pathway. Noteworthy, A151 within neutrophils is repackaged into apoptotic bodies following the death pattern reprogramming, which, when engulfed by microglia, polarizes microglia to an anti-inflammatory M2 phenotype. After four times treatment, the cerebral infarction area in the APTS group decreases by 5.1-fold. Thus, APTS provides a feasible, efficient, and practical drug delivery approach for reshaping the immune microenvironment and treating brain disorders in the central nervous system.

Indexed as

Disease Models, AnimalExtracellular TrapsIschemic StrokeMicrogliaNeutrophilsAnimalsDrug Delivery SystemsMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLNanoparticlesdrug deliveryischemic strokemicroglianeutrophil extracellular trapsneutrophil hitchhiking

Identifiers

PMID38444306
PMCPMC11077645
OpenAlexW4392516539

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.