Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38444026›Full record

ArticlePlant methods2024

Rapid and cost-effective molecular karyotyping in wheat, barley, and their cross-progeny by chromosome-specific multiplex PCR.

Mohammad Ali, Dávid Polgári, Adél Sepsi, Levente Kontra, Ágnes Dalmadi, Zoltán Havelda, László Sági, András Kis

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant methods, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Mohammad AliInstitute of Genetics and Biotechnology, Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Gödöllő, 2100, Hungary.
Dávid PolgáriInstitute of Genetics and Biotechnology, Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Gödöllő, 2100, Hungary.
Adél SepsiCentre for Agricultural Research, Hungarian Research Network, Martonvásár, 2462, Hungary.
Levente KontraInstitute of Genetics and Biotechnology, Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Gödöllő, 2100, Hungary.
Ágnes DalmadiInstitute of Genetics and Biotechnology, Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Gödöllő, 2100, Hungary.
Zoltán HaveldaInstitute of Genetics and Biotechnology, Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Gödöllő, 2100, Hungary.
László SágiCentre for Agricultural Research, Hungarian Research Network, Martonvásár, 2462, Hungary. sagi.laszlo@atk.hun-ren.hu.
András KisInstitute of Genetics and Biotechnology, Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Gödöllő, 2100, Hungary. kis.andras@uni-mate.hu.
Institute of Genetics · HUCentre for Agricultural Research · HUAgricultural Biotechnology Institute · HUMagyar Agrár- és Élettudományi Egyetem · HUNational Agricultural Research and Innovation Centre · HU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInterspecific hybridisation is a powerful tool for increasing genetic diversity in plant breeding programmes. Hexaploid wheat (Triticum aestivum, 2n = 42) × barley (Hordeum vulgare, 2n = 14) intergeneric hybrids can contribute to the transfer of agronomically useful traits by creating chromosome addition or translocation lines as well as full hybrids. Information on the karyotype of hybrid progenies possessing various combinations of wheat and barley chromosomes is thus essential for the subsequent breeding steps. Since the standard technique of chromosome in situ hybridisation is labour-intensive and requires specific skills. a routine, cost-efficient, and technically less demanding approach is beneficial both for research and breeding.

resultsWe developed a Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction (MPCR) method to identify individual wheat and barley chromosomes. Chromosome-specific primer pairs were designed based on the whole genome sequences of 'Chinese Spring' wheat and 'Golden Promise' barley as reference cultivars. A pool of potential primers was generated by applying a 20-nucleotide sliding window with consecutive one-nucleotide shifts on the reference genomes. After filtering for optimal primer properties and defined amplicon sizes to produce an ordered ladder-like pattern, the primer pool was manually curated and sorted into four MPCR primer sets for the wheat A, B, and D sub-genomes, and for the barley genome. The designed MPCR primer sets showed high chromosome specificity in silico for the genome sequences of all 18 wheat and barley cultivars tested. The MPCR primers proved experimentally also chromosome-specific for the reference cultivars as well as for 13 additional wheat and four barley genotypes. Analyses of 16 wheat × barley F1 hybrid plants demonstrated that the MPCR primer sets enable the fast and one-step detection of all wheat and barley chromosomes. Finally, the established genotyping system was fully corroborated with the standard genomic in situ hybridisation (GISH) technique.

conclusionsWheat and barley chromosome-specific MPCR offers a fast, labour-friendly, and versatile alternative to molecular cytogenetic detection of individual chromosomes. This method is also suitable for the high-throughput analysis of distinct (sub)genomes, and, in contrast to GISH, can be performed with any tissue type. The designed primer sets proved to be highly chromosome-specific over a wide range of wheat and barley genotypes as well as in wheat × barley hybrids. The described primer design strategy can be extended to many species with precise genome sequence information.

Indexed as

CerealGenotypingInterspecific hybridizationMolecular markerPrimer design

Identifiers

PMID38444026
PMCPMC10913579
OpenAlexW4392468975

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.