Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38443930›Full record

ArticleBMC medical ethics2024

Ethics of early detection of disease risk factors: A scoping review.

Sammie N G Jansen, Bart A Kamphorst, Bob C Mulder, Irene van Kamp, Sandra Boekhold, Peter van den Hazel, Marcel F Verweij

Open access · goldAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical ethics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Diagnostic Tests for Stage B Heart Failure.Current cardiology reports · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Toward a global research agenda for preventing multiple sclerosis.Multiple sclerosis (Houndmills, Basingstoke, England) · 2026
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Sammie N G JansenCentre for Sustainability, Environment and Health, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, RIVM, P.O. Box 1, Bilthoven, 3720 BA, The Netherlands. sammie.jansen@wur.nl.
Bart A KamphorstDepartment of Social Sciences, Wageningen University & Research, Hollandseweg 1, Wageningen, 6706 KN, The Netherlands.
Bob C MulderDepartment of Social Sciences, Wageningen University & Research, Hollandseweg 1, Wageningen, 6706 KN, The Netherlands.
Irene van KampCentre for Sustainability, Environment and Health, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, RIVM, P.O. Box 1, Bilthoven, 3720 BA, The Netherlands.
Sandra BoekholdCentre for Sustainability, Environment and Health, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, RIVM, P.O. Box 1, Bilthoven, 3720 BA, The Netherlands.
Peter van den HazelInternational Network on Children's Health, Environment & Safety (INCHES), Ellecom, the Netherlands.
Marcel F VerweijEthics Institute, Utrecht University, Janskerkhof 13a, Utrecht, 3512 BL, The Netherlands.
Wageningen University & Research · NLNational Institute for Public Health and the Environment · NLUtrecht University · NL

Funding

Horizon 2020 Framework Programme 874724
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundScientific and technological advancements in mapping and understanding the interrelated pathways through which biological and environmental exposures affect disease development create new possibilities for detecting disease risk factors. Early detection of such risk factors may help prevent disease onset or moderate the disease course, thereby decreasing associated disease burden, morbidity, and mortality. However, the ethical implications of screening for disease risk factors are unclear and the current literature provides a fragmented and case-by-case picture.

methodsTo identify key ethical considerations arising from the early detection of disease risk factors, we performed a systematic scoping review. The Scopus, Embase, and Philosopher's Index databases were searched for peer-reviewed, academic records, which were included if they were written in English or Dutch and concerned the ethics of (1) early detection of (2) disease risk factors for (3) disease caused by environmental factors or gene-environment interactions. All records were reviewed independently by at least two researchers.

resultsAfter screening 2034 titles and abstracts, and 112 full papers, 55 articles were included in the thematic synthesis of the results. We identified eight common ethical themes: (1) Reliability and uncertainty in early detection, (2) autonomy, (3) privacy, (4) beneficence and non-maleficence, (5) downstream burdens on others, (6) responsibility, (7) justice, and (8) medicalization and conceptual disruption. We identified several gaps in the literature, including a relative scarcity of research on ethical considerations associated with environmental preventive health interventions, a dearth of practical suggestions on how to address expressed concerns about overestimating health capacities, and a lack of insights into preventing undue attribution of health responsibility to individuals.

conclusionsThe ethical concerns arising with the early detection of risk factors are often interrelated and complex. Comprehensive ethical analyses are needed that are better embedded in normative frameworks and also assess and weigh the expected benefits of early risk factor detection. Such research is necessary for developing and implementing responsible and fair preventive health policies.

Indexed as

Ethical AnalysisHealth PolicyBeneficenceEarly DiagnosisHumansReproducibility of ResultsEarly detectionEnvironmental healthEthicsPreventionPublic healthRisk factorsScoping reviewScreening

Identifiers

PMID38443930
PMCPMC10913641
OpenAlexW4392462803

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.