ArticleBMC medical education2024
Using ACGME milestones as a formative assessment for the internal medicine clerkship: a consecutive two-year outcome and follow-up after graduation.
Article in BMC medical education, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis study evaluated the utility of using Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) Milestones as a formative assessment tool for the fifth- and sixth-grade medical students' performance in their internal medicine (IM) clerkship and the same students' performance in their post-graduate year (PGY) IM training.
methodsRetrospective data were collected from 65 medical students completing the two-year IM clerkship in the academic years 2019 and 2020 and 26 of the above students completing their PGY-1 training at the same university hospital in the academic year 2021. Data included the assessment results of 7 of the ACGME IM Milestones, information on admitted patients assigned to the students, and surveys of the students' satisfaction.
resultsThe analysis included 390 assessment results during the IM clerkship and 78 assessment results during the PGY-1 training. Clinical teachers commonly rated level 3 to medical students in the IM clerkship, with PC-2 subcompetency receiving the lowest rating among seven subcompetencies. The levels of most subcompetencies showed stationary in the two-year IM clerkship. Significant improvement was observed in all subcompetencies during the PGY-1 training. The medical students in the second-year IM clerkship expressed higher satisfaction with implementing Milestones than in their first-year IM clerkship and perceived Milestones assessments' usefulness as learning feedback.
conclusionsUsing ACGME Milestones as a formative assessment tool in the IM clerkship yielded promising outcomes. Longitudinal follow-up of subcompetencies facilitated tracking students' development and providing constructive feedback.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.