Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38443896›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2024

'It's about time': policymakers' and health practitioners' perspectives on implementing fertility care in the Gambian health system.

Anna Afferri, Susan Dierickx, Haddijatou Allen, Mustapha Bittaye, Musa Marena, Allan Pacey, Julie Balen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Anna AfferriSchool of Health and Related Research- ScHARR, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK. anna.afferri@gmail.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0306-6705
Susan DierickxDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium.
Haddijatou AllenMedical Research Council- MRC Unit The Gambia at LSHTM, Fajara, The Gambia.
Mustapha BittayeThe Gambia Ministry of Health, Banjul, The Gambia.
Musa MarenaThe Gambia Ministry of Health, Banjul, The Gambia.
Allan PaceyFaculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Julie BalenMedical Research Council- MRC Unit The Gambia at LSHTM, Fajara, The Gambia.
University of the Gambia · GMCanterbury Christ Church University · GBMRC Unit the Gambia · GMUniversity of Manchester · GBUniversity of Sheffield · GBVrije Universiteit Brussel · BE

Funding

Research England GCRF - Quality Related Sustainable Partnership Award 161059
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInfertility is a major health issue worldwide, yet very few examples of interventions addressing infertility in the Global South have been documented to date. In The Gambia, West Africa, infertility is recognised as a burden and the health authorities have included it in several health policies and the new National Reproductive Health Strategy however, a detailed operationalisation plan for fertility care has not yet been established. Here, we aim to understand and document the factors that influence the implementation of fertility care in The Gambia.

methodsWe conducted 46 semi-structured interviews with policymakers, implementers, and health practitioners in both the public and private sectors from July to November 2021. The interviews were transcribed, anonymised and analysed with NVivo Pro version 1.6.1. The analysis was initially inductive, with themes arising from the coding categorised according to the WHO health systems building blocks framework.

resultsThis study identified several barriers to a successful implementation of fertility care in The Gambia, including (i) a lack of routinely collected infertility data; (ii) an absence of financial protection mechanisms for patients, and/or a specific budget for infertility; (iii) limited cooperation between the public and private sectors in the provision of fertility care; and (iv) gaps in fertility care training among health practitioners. Conversely, enablers included: (i) strong national infertility leadership; and (ii) the integration of infertility care within public reproductive health services.

conclusionThe Gambian health system is not yet in the position to support a comprehensive fertility care package in its public health facilities. Several aspects of the implementation of fertility care must be considered in operationalising the health strategy including the systematic collection of infertility data, fertility awareness, and the provision of specialised fertility care training. Furthermore, a stronger partnership between the public and private sectors must be developed. Given the increasing availability of assisted reproductive technologies in the sub-Saharan Africa region, and the tendency to locate these technologies in the private sector, further research is needed to understand and identify the processes underlying the implementation of fertility care and to foster better integration with the existing health system.

Indexed as

Fertility PreservationInfertilityAfrica, WesternFertilityGambiaHumansAssisted reproductive technologiesFertility careHealth policy and practiceInfertilityPrivate sectorQualitative researchReproductive healthThe Gambia

Identifiers

PMID38443896
PMCPMC10916196
OpenAlexW4392453071

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.