Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38443673›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

A new R package to parse plant species occurrence records into unique collection events efficiently reduces data redundancy.

Pablo Hendrigo Alves de Melo, Nadia Bystriakova, Eve Lucas, Alexandre K Monro

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Pablo Hendrigo Alves de MeloIFMG - Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia de Minas Gerais, Campus Avançado Piumhi, Rua Severo Veloso, 1880 - Bairro Bela Vista, Piumhi, Minas Gerais, 37925-000, Brazil.
Nadia BystriakovaThe Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London, SW7 5BD, UK. n.bystriakova@nhm.ac.uk.
Eve LucasRoyal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, London, TW9 3AE, UK.
Alexandre K MonroRoyal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, London, TW9 3AE, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biodiversity data aggregators, such as Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF) suffer from inflation of the number of occurrence records when data from different databases are merged but not fully reconciled. The ParseGBIF workflow is designed to parse duplicate GBIF species occurrence records into unique collection events (gatherings) and to optimise the quality of the spatial data associated with them. ParseGBIF provides tools to verify and standardize species scientific names according to the World Checklist of Vascular Plants taxonomic backbone, and to parse duplicate records into unique 'collection events', in the process compiling the most informative spatial data, where more than one duplicate is available, and providing crude estimates of taxonomic and spatial data quality. When GBIF occurrence records for a medium-sized vascular plant family, the Myrtaceae, were processed by ParseGBIF, the average number of records useful for spatial analysis increased by 180%. ParseGBIF could therefore be valuable in the evaluation of species' occurrences at the national scale in support for national biodiversity plans, identification of plant areas important for biodiversity, sample bias estimation to inform future sampling efforts, and to forecast species range shifts in response to global climate change.

Indexed as

TracheophytaBiodiversityChecklistClimate ChangeData AccuracyDigital duplicatesGatheringsGlobal biodiversity information facilityMyrtaceaeSpecies taxonomic namesSynonymsTaxonomic inflationWorld checklist of vascular plants

Identifiers

PMID38443673
PMCPMC10914741

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.