Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38443645›Full record

Observational studyAdvances in therapy2024

Satisfaction with the Injection Experience of a New, Citrate-Free Formulation of Ixekizumab.

Sanjay Chabra, Julie Birt, Rebecca Bolce, Jeffrey Lisse, William N Malatestinic, Baojin Zhu, Miriam Kimel, Julie McCormack, Marissa Stefan, W Chad Cragun

Open access · hybridAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Advances in therapy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Sanjay ChabraTexas Arthritis Center, El Paso, TX, USA.
Julie BirtEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA. birt_julie@lilly.com.
Rebecca BolceEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Jeffrey LisseEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
William N MalatestinicEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Baojin ZhuEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Miriam KimelEvidera, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Julie McCormackEvidera, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Marissa StefanEvidera, Bethesda, MD, USA.
W Chad CragunDermatology San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA.
Eli Lilly (United States) · USIthaka Harbors · USUrology San Antonio · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionA new, citrate-free ixekizumab formulation, which is bioequivalent to the original formulation, was associated with significant reduction in injection site pain. This study evaluates patient satisfaction with the first injection experience of citrate-free ixekizumab in a real-world setting.

methodsA non-interventional, observational, web-based survey of adults (≥ 18 years) with psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis, or axial spondyloarthritis was conducted between August 2022 and March 2023. Patients enrolled in the Taltz US Customer Support Program were identified as receiving either the original ixekizumab or initiating citrate-free ixekizumab. Patients receiving original ixekizumab completed one survey at baseline to assess satisfaction with the formulation and one survey after switching to assess satisfaction, willingness to continue using and recommending citrate-free ixekizumab, and formulation preference. Participants previously exposed to ixekizumab completed one survey to assess their satisfaction and willingness to continue using and recommending citrate-free ixekizumab. Descriptive and comparative statistics are reported for patients that switched from original to citrate-free ixekizumab (n = 361); and descriptive statistics are reported for patients not previously exposed to ixekizumab (n = 90).

resultsA total of 451 patients were included in the analysis. Significantly more patients were satisfied with their first injection with citrate-free ixekizumab compared to original ixekizumab (83.9% vs. 71.7% respectively; p = 0.0001). Almost all patients who switched from original ixekizumab were definitely or mostly willing to continue using and recommending citrate-free ixekizumab (93.9% and 93.4%, respectively). Additionally, 94.2% of patients who switched from original to citrate-free ixekizumab preferred citrate-free ixekizumab or had no preference. Three-fourths of patients not previously exposed to ixekizumab were satisfied with their first injection with citrate-free ixekizumab and 94.5% were definitely or mostly willing to continue using citrate-free ixekizumab.

conclusionThe citrate-free ixekizumab formulation was preferred and well accepted by most patients who switched from the original ixekizumab formulation. Similar findings were seen for those newly initiating citrate-free ixekizumab.

Indexed as

Arthritis, PsoriaticPsoriasisAdultAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedCitratesCitric AcidHumansPersonal SatisfactionTreatment OutcomeAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedCitratesCitric AcidixekizumabAnkylosing spondylitisAxial spondyloarthritisCitrate-free bufferHealth-related quality of lifeInjection site painPatient satisfactionPsoriasisPsoriatic arthritisSubcutaneous injection

Identifiers

PMID38443645
PMCPMC10960761
OpenAlexW4392449712

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.