Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38443438›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Comparable outcomes of outpatient remdesivir and sotrovimab among high-risk patients with mild to moderate COVID-19 during the omicron BA.1 surge.

Supavit Chesdachai, Christina G Rivera, Kristin C Cole, Hilary R Teaford, Maria L Gonzalez Suarez, Jennifer J Larsen, Ravindra Ganesh, Sidna Tulledge-Scheitel, Raymund R Razonable

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Supavit ChesdachaiDivision of Public Health, Infectious Diseases, and Occupational Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA. chesdachai.supavit@mayo.edu.
Christina G RiveraDepartment of Pharmacy, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Kristin C ColeDepartment of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Hilary R TeafordDepartment of Pharmacy, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Maria L Gonzalez SuarezDivision of Nephrology and Hypertension, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Jennifer J LarsenDepartment of Nursing, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Ravindra GaneshDepartment of General Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Sidna Tulledge-ScheitelDepartment of Community Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Raymund R RazonableDivision of Public Health, Infectious Diseases, and Occupational Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA. razonable.raymund@mayo.edu.
Mayo Clinic · USMayo Clinic in Arizona · USMayo Clinic in Florida · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Studies conducted prior to SARS-CoV-2 Omicron demonstrated that sotrovimab and remdesivir reduced hospitalization among high-risk outpatients with mild to moderate COVID-19. However, their effectiveness has not been directly compared. This study examined all high-risk outpatients with mild to moderate COVID-19 who received either remdesivir or sotrovimab at Mayo Clinic during the Omicron BA.1 surge from January to March 2022. COVID-19-related hospitalization or death within 28 days were compared between the two treatment groups. Among 3257 patients, 2158 received sotrovimab and 1099 received remdesivir. Patients treated with sotrovimab were younger and had lower comorbidity but were more likely to be immunocompromised than remdesivir-treated patients. The majority (89%) had received at least one dose of COVID-19 vaccine. COVID-19-related hospitalization (1.5% and 1.0% in remdesivir and sotrovimab, respectively, p = .15) and mortality within 28 days (0.4% in both groups, p = .82) were similarly low. A propensity score weighted analysis demonstrated no significant difference in the outcomes between the two groups. We demonstrated favorable outcomes that were not significantly different between patients treated with remdesivir or sotrovimab.

Indexed as

Antibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntibodies, NeutralizingCOVID-19OutpatientsAdenosine MonophosphateAlanineCOVID-19 Drug TreatmentCOVID-19 VaccinesHumansSARS-CoV-2Adenosine MonophosphateAlanineAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntibodies, NeutralizingCOVID-19 VaccinesremdesivirsotrovimabCOVID-19OutcomeRemdesivirSARS-2-CoVSotrovimab

Identifiers

PMID38443438
PMCPMC10914739
OpenAlexW4392458920

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.