Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38443373›Full record

ArticleNPJ biofilms and microbiomes2024

Effect of model methanogens on the electrochemical activity, stability, and microbial community structure of Geobacter spp. dominated biofilm anodes.

Daniel Dzofou Ngoumelah, Tonje Marita Bjerkan Heggeset, Tone Haugen, Snorre Sulheim, Alexander Wentzel, Falk Harnisch, Jörg Kretzschmar

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ biofilms and microbiomes, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Daniel Dzofou NgoumelahDBFZ Deutsches Biomasseforschungszentrum gemeinnützige GmbH (German Biomass Research Centre), Department of Biochemical Conversion, 04347, Leipzig, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0982-7365
Tonje Marita Bjerkan HeggesetSINTEF Industry, Department of Biotechnology and Nanomedicine, 7034, Trondheim, Norway.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1221-8598
Tone HaugenSINTEF Industry, Department of Biotechnology and Nanomedicine, 7034, Trondheim, Norway.
Snorre SulheimSINTEF Industry, Department of Biotechnology and Nanomedicine, 7034, Trondheim, Norway.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3967-1683
Alexander WentzelSINTEF Industry, Department of Biotechnology and Nanomedicine, 7034, Trondheim, Norway.
Falk HarnischHelmholtz Centre for Environmental Research - UFZ, Department of Microbial Biotechnology, 04318, Leipzig, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0014-4640
Jörg KretzschmarDBFZ Deutsches Biomasseforschungszentrum gemeinnützige GmbH (German Biomass Research Centre), Department of Biochemical Conversion, 04347, Leipzig, Germany. joerg.kretzschmar@hszg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5970-6399
SINTEF · NODeutsches Biomasseforschungszentrum · DEHelmholtz Centre for Environmental Research · DE

Funding

Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst (German Academic Exchange Service) 57381414EC | Horizon 2020 Framework Programme (EU Framework Programme for Research and Innovation H2020) 731101
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Combining anaerobic digestion (AD) and microbial electrochemical technologies (MET) in AD-MET holds great potential. Methanogens have been identified as one cause of decreased electrochemical activity and deterioration of Geobacter spp. biofilm anodes. A better understanding of the different interactions between methanogenic genera/species and Geobacter spp. biofilms is needed to shed light on the observed reduction in electrochemical activity and stability of Geobacter spp. dominated biofilms as well as observed changes in microbial communities of AD-MET. Here, we have analyzed electrochemical parameters and changes in the microbial community of Geobacter spp. biofilm anodes when exposed to three representative methanogens with different metabolic pathways, i.e., Methanosarcina barkeri, Methanobacterium formicicum, and Methanothrix soehngenii. M. barkeri negatively affected the performance and stability of Geobacter spp. biofilm anodes only in the initial batches. In contrast, M. formicicum did not affect the stability of Geobacter spp. biofilm anodes but caused a decrease in maximum current density of ~37%. M. soehngenii induced a coloration change of Geobacter spp. biofilm anodes and a decrease in the total transferred charge by ~40%. Characterization of biofilm samples after each experiment by 16S rRNA metabarcoding, whole metagenome nanopore sequencing, and shotgun sequencing showed a higher relative abundance of Geobacter spp. after exposure to M. barkeri as opposed to M. formicicum or M. soehngenii, despite the massive biofilm dispersal observed during initial exposure to M. barkeri.

Indexed as

GeobacterMicrobiotaBiofilmsElectrodesRNA, Ribosomal, 16SRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID38443373
PMCPMC10915144
OpenAlexW4392460813

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.