Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38443349›Full record

ArticleNature communications2024

Improved modeling of human vision by incorporating robustness to blur in convolutional neural networks.

Hojin Jang, Frank Tong

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
21.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Generating metamers of human scene understanding.... International Conference on Learning Representations · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Computational origins of shape perception.PLoS computational biology · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. A compressed code for memory discrimination.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Hojin JangDepartment of Psychology, Vanderbilt Vision Research Center, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA. hojin4671@korea.ac.kr.ORCID 0000-0002-1756-1467
Frank TongDepartment of Psychology, Vanderbilt Vision Research Center, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA. frank.tong@vanderbilt.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-3437-1331
Korea University · KRVanderbilt University · US

Funding

Shop Module CoreP30EY008126 · NEI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI David J. Calkins · 1989 to 2026
$19.6M
Overall: Eunice Kennedy Shriver Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Research Center at VanderbiltP50HD103537 · NICHD · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI Jeffrey L Neul · 2020 to 2026
$10.3M
Learning the visual and cognitive bases of lung nodule detectionR01CA240274 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI FRANK TONG · 2021 to 2026
$1.8M
Neural and computational mechanisms underlying robust object recognitionR01EY035157 · NEI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI FRANK TONG · 2023 to 2026
$1.6M
Perceptual functions of the human lateral geniculate nucleusR01EY029278 · NEI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI TONG, FRANK · 2018 to 2021
$1.5M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA240274NEI NIH HHS P30 EY008126NEI NIH HHS R01 EY029278NEI NIH HHS R01 EY035157NICHD NIH HHS P50 HD103537
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Whenever a visual scene is cast onto the retina, much of it will appear degraded due to poor resolution in the periphery; moreover, optical defocus can cause blur in central vision. However, the pervasiveness of blurry or degraded input is typically overlooked in the training of convolutional neural networks (CNNs). We hypothesized that the absence of blurry training inputs may cause CNNs to rely excessively on high spatial frequency information for object recognition, thereby causing systematic deviations from biological vision. We evaluated this hypothesis by comparing standard CNNs with CNNs trained on a combination of clear and blurry images. We show that blur-trained CNNs outperform standard CNNs at predicting neural responses to objects across a variety of viewing conditions. Moreover, blur-trained CNNs acquire increased sensitivity to shape information and greater robustness to multiple forms of visual noise, leading to improved correspondence with human perception. Our results provide multi-faceted neurocomputational evidence that blurry visual experiences may be critical for conferring robustness to biological visual systems.

Indexed as

Neural Networks, ComputerVisual PerceptionHumansRetina

Identifiers

PMID38443349
PMCPMC10915141
OpenAlexW4392460428

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.