ArticleRespiratory care2024
Synergistic Effect of Manually Assisted Cough During Mechanical Insufflation-Exsufflation in Patients With Spinal Cord Injury.
Article in Respiratory care, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- An update on spinal cord injury and diaphragm neuromotor control.Expert review of respiratory medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMechanical insufflation-exsufflation (MI-E) and manually assisted cough are frequently employed cough augmentation methods for enhancing cough efficiency in individuals with cervical spinal cord injury (CSCI). This study aimed to evaluate the synergistic impact of combining manually assisted cough and MI-E on cough peak flow in subjects with CSCI and identify their related factors.
methodsFifteen subjects with CSCI with cough peak flow > -270 L/min underwent 5 consecutive days of 5 cough augmentation sessions; cough peak flow during exsufflation and the total insufflation volume (TIV) during insufflation were measured. Only MI-E was administered on days 1 and 5, whereas on days 2-4 one MI-E-only session followed by 3 MI-E and manually assisted cough sessions was implemented followed by a fifth MI-E-only session. The cumulative and carry-over effects of increasing treatment sessions and any associated factor on cough peak flow during MI-E-assisted coughing were assessed using a linear mixed model (LMM) with repetitive air-flow measurements within the same participants.
resultsNo cumulative or carry-over effects of manually assisted cough and MI-E were shown with the accumulation of treatment days or sessions. The LMM confirmed that using manually assisted cough (-0.283 L/s,
conclusionsThe use of manually assisted cough and amount of TIV correlated with improved cough peak flow, emphasizing the importance of adequate in-expiratory support. No carry-over effect was associated with using manually assisted cough, highlighting the need to combine MI-E with manually assisted cough for each MI-E treatment to achieve optimal cough effectiveness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.