Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38442296›Full record

ArticleThe Indian journal of medical research2024

Evaluation of liver segmental dose threshold for hepatocyte regeneration following liver stereotactic body radiation therapy.

Karishma George, Supriya Chopra, Karthick Rajamanickam, Kishore Joshi, Jamema Swamidas, Nitin Shetty, Reena Engineer

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Indian journal of medical research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Influencing factors and mechanism of hepatocyte regeneration.Journal of translational medicine · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Karishma GeorgeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Advanced Centre for Treatment, Research and Education in Cancer, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Supriya ChopraDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Advanced Centre for Treatment, Research and Education in Cancer, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Karthick RajamanickamDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Advanced Centre for Treatment, Research and Education in Cancer, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Kishore JoshiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Advanced Centre for Treatment, Research and Education in Cancer, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Jamema SwamidasDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Advanced Centre for Treatment, Research and Education in Cancer, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Nitin ShettyDepartment of Interventional Radiology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Reena EngineerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Homi Bhabha National Institute · INTata Memorial Hospital · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND

objectivesThere is limited evidence studying the relationship of liver segmental dose and segmental volume changes. The segmental dose thresholds could potentially allow for segmental regeneration after liver stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). Given improved survival in hepatocellular cancer (HCC) and liver metastases and more salvage therapy options, this has become an important clinical question to explore. This study assesses the impact of liver segmental dose on segmental volume changes (gain or loss) after SBRT.

methodsLiver segmental contours were delineated on baseline and serial follow up triphasic computed tomography scans. The volumes of total liver and doses to total liver, uninvolved liver and individual segments were noted. A correlation was evaluated between liver/segmental volume and dose using Pearson's correlation. Furthermore, receiver operator's curve (ROC) analysis was performed to find the segmental dose, i.e . predictive for liver volume loss.

resultsA total of 140 non-tumour liver segments were available for analysis in 21 participants. Overall, 13 participants showed loss of overall liver volume and eight showed gain of overall liver volume. The median dose in segments reporting an increase in volume was 9.1 Gy (7-36 Gy). The median dose in segments losing volume was 15.5 Gy (1-49 Gy). On ROC analysis, segmental dose >11 Gy was associated with volume loss. On univariate analysis, only liver segmental dose contributed to a significant segmental volume loss. INTERPRETATION

conclusionsWe propose from the findings of this study that in SBRT for large hepatocellular cancer or liver metastases, liver segments should be individually delineated. Furthermore, 3-5 liver segments may be preferentially subjected to <9 Gy to facilitate hepatocyte regeneration. Preferential sparing of uninvolved liver segments may improve outcomes in liver stereotaxyas lower segmental doses were associated with liver regeneration. This may have implications on future liver SBRT planning where segmental doses may be as important as the mean dose.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, HepatocellularLiver NeoplasmsRadiosurgeryHepatocytesHumansRetrospective StudiesTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID38442296
PMCPMC11050757
OpenAlexW4394608073

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.