Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38442295›Full record

ArticleGlobal spine journal2024

Scoping Review with Topic Modeling on the Diagnostic Criteria for Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy.

Stavros Matsoukas, Carl Moritz Zipser, Freschta Zipser-Mohammadzada, Najmeh Kheram, Andrea Boraschi, Zhilin Jiang, Lindsay Tetreault, Michael G Fehlings, Benjamin M Davies, Konstantinos Margetis

Open access · goldAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Global spine journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 7 institutions in 4 countries.

Stavros MatsoukasDepartment of Neurosurgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5902-0637
Carl Moritz ZipserSpinal Cord Injury Center, Balgrist University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland.
Freschta Zipser-MohammadzadaSpinal Cord Injury Center, Balgrist University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland.
Najmeh KheramSpinal Cord Injury Center, Balgrist University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland.
Andrea BoraschiThe Interface Group, Institute of Physiology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-2908-5234
Zhilin JiangKing's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Lindsay TetreaultDepartment of Neurology, Langone Health, Graduate Medical Education, New York University, New York, NY, USA.
Michael G FehlingsDivision of Neurosurgery and Spine Program, University of Toronto and Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-5722-6364
Benjamin M DaviesMyelopathy.org, International Charity for Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0591-5069
Konstantinos MargetisDepartment of Neurosurgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3715-8093
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · USUniversitätsklinik Balgrist · CHUniversity of Zurich · CHKing's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust · GBNYU Langone Health · USUniversity Health Network · CAUniversity of Cambridge · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

STUDY

designThis study is a scoping review.

objectiveThere is a broad variability in the definition of degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) and no standardized set of diagnostic criteria to date.

methodsWe interrogated the Myelopathy.org database, a hand-indexed database of primary clinical studies conducted exclusively on DCM in humans between 2005-2021. The DCM inclusion criteria used in these studies were inputted into 3 topic modeling algorithms: Hierarchical Dirichlet Process (HDP), Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA), and BERtopic. The emerging topics were subjected to manual labeling and interpretation.

resultsOf 1676 reports, 120 papers (7.16%) had well-defined inclusion criteria and were subjected to topic modeling. Four topics emerged from the HDP model: disturbance from extremity weakness and motor signs; fine-motor and sensory disturbance of upper extremity; a combination of imaging and clinical findings is required for the diagnosis; and "reinforcing" (or modifying) factors that can aid in the diagnosis in borderline cases. The LDA model showed the following topics: disturbance to the patient is required for the diagnosis; reinforcing factors can aid in the diagnosis in borderline cases; clinical findings from the extremities; and a combination of imaging and clinical findings is required for the diagnosis. BERTopic identified the following topics: imaging abnormality, typical clinical features, range of objective criteria, and presence of clinical findings.

conclusionsThis review provides quantifiable data that only a minority of past studies in DCM provided meaningful inclusion criteria. The items and patterns found here are very useful for the development of diagnostic criteria for DCM.

Indexed as

cervicaldegenerativedisc herniationmagnetic resonance imagingmyelopathyspinal cord injury

Identifiers

PMID38442295
PMCPMC11418695
OpenAlexW4392448095

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.