Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38442129›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Antibacterial activity and phytochemical screening of traditional medicinal plants most preferred for treating infectious diseases in Habru District, North Wollo Zone, Amhara Region, Ethiopia.

Mulugeta Alemu, Ermias Lulekal, Zemede Asfaw, Bikila Warkineh, Asfaw Debella, Abiy Abebe, Sileshi Degu, Eyob Debebe

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
24.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. The Utilisation ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Mulugeta AlemuCollege of Natural and Computational Sciences, Department of Plant Biology and Biodiversity Management, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.ORCID 0000-0002-0073-3824
Ermias LulekalCollege of Natural and Computational Sciences, Department of Plant Biology and Biodiversity Management, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Zemede AsfawCollege of Natural and Computational Sciences, Department of Plant Biology and Biodiversity Management, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Bikila WarkinehCollege of Natural and Computational Sciences, Department of Plant Biology and Biodiversity Management, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Asfaw DebellaArmauer Hansen Research Institute, Traditional and Modern Medicine Research and Development Directorate, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Abiy AbebeArmauer Hansen Research Institute, Traditional and Modern Medicine Research and Development Directorate, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Sileshi DeguArmauer Hansen Research Institute, Traditional and Modern Medicine Research and Development Directorate, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Eyob DebebeArmauer Hansen Research Institute, Traditional and Modern Medicine Research and Development Directorate, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Armauer Hansen Research Institute · ETAddis Ababa University · ETEthiopian Civil Service University · ET

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ethiopia's healthcare system relies on traditional medicinal practices that use medicinal plants to treat human and livestock ailments. However, the lack of empirical validation regarding the efficacy of these treatments against specific infectious diseases necessitates rigorous scientific investigations. The objective of this study was to investigate the antibacterial activity and phytochemical screening on five selected medicinal plant species, namely Solanum somalense Franchet., Verbascum sinaiticum Benth., Rumex nervosus Vahl, Withania somnifera (L.) Dunal and Calpurnia aurea (Ait.) Benth. The plants were first identified jointly with local informants and later considering mainly their high informant consensus and fidelity level values for their efficacy in treating infectious diseases in the area. Ethanol and aqueous extracts were prepared from the plant materials, and their antibacterial activities were evaluated against standard bacterial strains, representing both gram-positive and gram-negative types. To assess the antibacterial activity of the extracts, the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) was determined using the broth dilution method. Additionally, phytochemical screening was performed using standard qualitative tests to identify various secondary metabolites. The results indicated antibacterial efficacy in the ethanol extracts of S. somalense, W. somnifera, and C. aurea against particular bacterial strains (S. somalense against S. agalactiae with MIC of 1.5 mg/mL; W. somnifera against S. aureus and E. coli, with MIC of 2 mg/mL; C. aurea against E. coli and K. pneumoniae, with MICs of 3 mg/mL and 3.5 mg/mL, respectively). The results of the phytochemical screening indicated the presence of steroids, alkaloids, flavonoids, saponins, and terpenoids. The selected medicinal plants demonstrated promising antibacterial activity against certain bacterial strains. The current findings support the long-standing claim of the traditional medical system of the study area for their continued use of these plants in their treatment of infectious diseases. Further investigation is required to isolate the responsible active compounds and characterize the constituents and description of their antibacterial effect for possible use in areas where these infectious diseases are major health problems.

Indexed as

Communicable DiseasesPlants, MedicinalAnti-Bacterial AgentsEscherichia coliEthanolEthiopiaHumansKlebsiella pneumoniaeStaphylococcus aureusAnti-Bacterial AgentsEthanol

Identifiers

PMID38442129
PMCPMC10914283
OpenAlexW4392474239

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.