Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38441952›Full record

ArticleJMIR formative research2024

Machine Learning-Based Approach for Identifying Research Gaps: COVID-19 as a Case Study.

Alaa Abd-Alrazaq, Abdulqadir J Nashwan, Zubair Shah, Ahmad Abujaber, Dari Alhuwail, Jens Schneider, Rawan AlSaad, Hazrat Ali, Waleed Alomoush, Arfan Ahmed and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR formative research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Alaa Abd-Alrazaq *AI Center for Precision Health, Weill Cornell Medicine-Qatar, Doha, Qatar.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7695-4626
Abdulqadir J Nashwan *Department of Nursing, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4845-4119
Zubair ShahDivision of Information and Computing Technology, College of Science and Engineering, Hamad Bin Khalifa University, Doha, Qatar.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7389-3274
Ahmad AbujaberNursing Department, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8704-4991
Dari AlhuwailInformation Science Department, College of Life Sciences, Kuwait University, Kuwait, Kuwait.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5038-3044
Jens SchneiderDivision of Information and Computing Technology, College of Science and Engineering, Hamad Bin Khalifa University, Doha, Qatar.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0546-2816
Rawan AlSaadAI Center for Precision Health, Weill Cornell Medicine-Qatar, Doha, Qatar.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3235-0860
Hazrat AliFaculty of Computing and Information Technology, Sohar University, Sohar, Oman.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3058-5794
Waleed AlomoushSchool of Information Technology, Skyline University College, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2937-4327
Arfan AhmedAI Center for Precision Health, Weill Cornell Medicine-Qatar, Doha, Qatar.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4025-5767
Sarah AzizAI Center for Precision Health, Weill Cornell Medicine-Qatar, Doha, Qatar.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0861-9743
Weill Cornell Medical College in Qatar · QAHamad bin Khalifa University · QAHamad Medical Corporation · QAKuwait University · KWSkyline University College · AESohar University · OM

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundResearch gaps refer to unanswered questions in the existing body of knowledge, either due to a lack of studies or inconclusive results. Research gaps are essential starting points and motivation in scientific research. Traditional methods for identifying research gaps, such as literature reviews and expert opinions, can be time consuming, labor intensive, and prone to bias. They may also fall short when dealing with rapidly evolving or time-sensitive subjects. Thus, innovative scalable approaches are needed to identify research gaps, systematically assess the literature, and prioritize areas for further study in the topic of interest.

objectiveIn this paper, we propose a machine learning-based approach for identifying research gaps through the analysis of scientific literature. We used the COVID-19 pandemic as a case study.

methodsWe conducted an analysis to identify research gaps in COVID-19 literature using the COVID-19 Open Research (CORD-19) data set, which comprises 1,121,433 papers related to the COVID-19 pandemic. Our approach is based on the BERTopic topic modeling technique, which leverages transformers and class-based term frequency-inverse document frequency to create dense clusters allowing for easily interpretable topics. Our BERTopic-based approach involves 3 stages: embedding documents, clustering documents (dimension reduction and clustering), and representing topics (generating candidates and maximizing candidate relevance).

resultsAfter applying the study selection criteria, we included 33,206 abstracts in the analysis of this study. The final list of research gaps identified 21 different areas, which were grouped into 6 principal topics. These topics were: "virus of COVID-19," "risk factors of COVID-19," "prevention of COVID-19," "treatment of COVID-19," "health care delivery during COVID-19," "and impact of COVID-19." The most prominent topic, observed in over half of the analyzed studies, was "the impact of COVID-19."

conclusionsThe proposed machine learning-based approach has the potential to identify research gaps in scientific literature. This study is not intended to replace individual literature research within a selected topic. Instead, it can serve as a guide to formulate precise literature search queries in specific areas associated with research questions that previous publications have earmarked for future exploration. Future research should leverage an up-to-date list of studies that are retrieved from the most common databases in the target area. When feasible, full texts or, at minimum, discussion sections should be analyzed rather than limiting their analysis to abstracts. Furthermore, future studies could evaluate more efficient modeling algorithms, especially those combining topic modeling with statistical uncertainty quantification, such as conformal prediction.

Indexed as

BERTBERTopiccoronavirusCOVIDCOVID-19literature reviewmachine learningnatural language processingNLPresearch gapresearch gapsresearch topicresearch topicsreview methodologyreview methodsSARS-CoV-2scientific literaturetext analysistopic clustering

Identifiers

PMID38441952
PMCPMC10916961
OpenAlexW4392473475

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.