Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38441859›Full record

SynthesisJournal of racial and ethnic health disparities2025

Is Primary Care Patient Experience Associated with Provider-Patient Language Concordance and Use of Interpreters for Spanish-preferring Patients: A Systematic Literature Review.

Denise D Quigley, Nabeel Qureshi, Zachary Predmore, Yareliz Diaz, Ron D Hays

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Denise D QuigleyRAND Corporation, 1776 Main Street, Santa Monica, CA, 90407-2138, USA. quigley@rand.org.ORCID 0000-0002-3815-908X
Nabeel QureshiRAND Corporation, 1776 Main Street, Santa Monica, CA, 90407-2138, USA.
Zachary PredmoreRAND Corporation, 20 Park Plaza, Suite 910, Boston, MA, USA.
Yareliz DiazRAND Corporation, 20 Park Plaza, Suite 910, Boston, MA, USA.
Ron D HaysRAND Corporation, 1776 Main Street, Santa Monica, CA, 90407-2138, USA.

Funding

Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems V (CAHPS V)U18HS025920 · AHRQ · RAND CORPORATION · PI HAYS, RONALD DALE · 2017 to 2021
$5.6M
Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS) VIU18HS029321 · AHRQ · RAND CORPORATION · PI ELLIOTT, MARC, HAYS, RONALD DALE · 2022 to 2024
$4.5M
AHRQ HHS U18 HS025920AHRQ HHS U18HS025920AHRQ HHS U18 HS029321AHRQ HHS U18HS029321
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHealthcare provided by a bilingual provider or with the assistance of an interpreter improves care quality; however, their associations with patient experience are unknown. We reviewed associations of patient experience with provider-patient language concordance (LC) and use of interpreters for Spanish-preferring patients.

methodWe reviewed articles from academic databases 2005-2023 following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines and Joanna Briggs Institute Checklists to rate study quality. We reviewed 217 (of 2193) articles, yielding 17 for inclusion.

resultsOf the 17 included articles, most articles focused on primary (n = 6 studies) or pediatric care (n = 5). All were cross-sectional, collecting data by self-administered surveys (n = 7) or interviews (n = 4). Most assessed the relationship between LC or interpreter use and patient experience by cross-sectional associations (n = 13). Two compared subgroups, and two provided descriptive insights into the conversational content (provider-interpreter-patient). None evaluated interventions, so evidence on effective strategies is lacking. LC for Spanish-preferring patients was a mix of null findings (n = 4) and associations with better patient experience (n = 3) (e.g., receiving diet/exercise counseling and better provider communication). Evidence on interpreter use indicated better (n = 2), worse (n = 2), and no association (n = 2) with patient experience. Associations between Spanish-language preference and patient experience were not significant (n = 5) or indicated worse experience (n = 4) (e.g., long waits, problems getting appointments, and not understanding nurses).

conclusionLC is associated with better patient experience. Using interpreters is associated with better patient experience but only with high-quality interpreters. Strategies are needed to eliminate disparities and enhance communication for all Spanish-preferring primary care patients, whether with a bilingual provider or an interpreter.

Indexed as

Communication BarriersHispanic or LatinoPatient PreferencePhysician-Patient RelationsPrimary Health CareTranslatingCross-Sectional StudiesHumansLanguageMultilingualismClinician and group CAHPS surveyPatient experiencePrimary careQuality of care

Identifiers

PMID38441859
PMCPMC11374925

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.