ArticleOphthalmology and therapy2024
A Novel Grading System for Diffuse Chorioretinal Atrophy in Pathologic Myopia.
Article in Ophthalmology and therapy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Artificial intelligence in pathologic myopia: a review of clinical research studies.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Study on fundus characteristics of preschool children based on artificial intelligence quantitative technology.BMC ophthalmology · 2026Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
introductionThis study aims to quantitatively assess diffuse chorioretinal atrophy (DCA) in pathologic myopia and establish a standardized classification system utilizing artificial intelligence.
methodsA total of 202 patients underwent comprehensive examinations, and 338 eyes were included in the study. The methodology involved image preprocessing, sample labeling, employing deep learning segmentation models, measuring and calculating the area and density of DCA lesions. Lesion severity of DCA was graded using statistical methods, and grades were assigned to describe the morphology of corresponding fundus photographs. Hierarchical clustering was employed to categorize diffuse atrophy fundus into three groups based on the area and density of diffuse atrophy (G1, G2, G3), while high myopic fundus without diffuse atrophy was designated as G0. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and nonparametric tests were conducted to assess the statistical association with different grades of DCA.
resultsOn the basis of the area and density of DCA, the condition was classified into four grades: G0, G1 (0 < density ≤ 0.093), G2 (0.093 < density ≤ 0.245), and G3 (0.245 < density ≤ 0.712). Fundus photographs depicted a progressive enlargement of atrophic lesions, evolving from punctate-shaped to patchy with indistinct boundaries. DCA atrophy lesions exhibited a gradual shift in color from brown-yellow to yellow-white, originating from the temporal side of the optic disc and extending towards the macula, with severe cases exhibiting widespread distribution throughout the posterior pole. Patients with DCA were significantly older [34.00 (27.00, 48.00) vs 29.00 (26.00, 34.00) years], possessed a longer axial length (28.85 ± 1.57 vs 27.11 ± 1.01 mm), and exhibited a more myopic spherical equivalent [- 13.00 (- 16.00, - 10.50) vs - 9.09 ± 2.41 D] compared to those without DCA (G0) (all P < 0.001). In eyes with DCA, a trend emerged as grades increased from G1 to G3, showing associations with older age, longer axial length, deeper myopic spherical equivalent, larger area of parapapillary atrophy, and increased fundus tessellated density (all P < 0.001).
conclusionsThe novel grading system for DCA, based on assessments of area and density, serves as a reliable measure for evaluating the severity of this condition, making it suitable for widespread application in the screening of pathologic myopia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.