Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38441823›Full record

ArticleCommunity mental health journal2024

A County-Level Case Study of Early Psychosis in the Context of a Hybrid Juvenile Competency Restoration and Mental Health Problem-Solving Court and Linkage to Coordinated Specialty Care Services.

Linda Callejas, Nev Jones, Amy Watson, Marie Marino

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Community mental health journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Linda CallejasDepartment of Child & Family Studies, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA. callejas@usf.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-4208-5650
Nev JonesSchool of Social Work, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4177-0621
Amy WatsonSchool of Social Work, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5310-6293
Marie MarinoOffice of the Public Defender, 13th Judicial Circuit, Hillsborough County, Tampa, FL, USA.

Funding

Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute 10252-USF
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An important and unresolved question in the context of the implementation of coordinated specialty care (CSC) for early psychosis in the United States is the extent to which youth and young adults from marginalized backgrounds are able to equitably access CSC services. In this brief report, we describe pathways between a county hybrid juvenile competency restoration and mental health problem-solving court ('Court'), serving youth with high rates of psychosis and multiple risk factors for poor long-term outcomes, and local CSC services. We found that the Court was overall successful in linking youth with psychosis to care, but in the majority of cases this was not CSC programming more specifically. Drawing on Court and CSC records as well as family interviews, we report on factors contributing to low linkage to CSC, including family-side barriers (lack of transportation, preference for lower intensity / lower demand services) and provider-side barriers, including eligibility criteria such as duration of psychosis, that ultimately exclude otherwise eligible Court-involved youth.

Indexed as

Psychotic DisordersAdolescentFemaleHealth Services AccessibilityHumansJuvenile DelinquencyMaleMental CompetencyMental Health ServicesProblem SolvingUnited StatesYoung AdultCompetency RestorationFirst Episode PsychosisJuvenile Mental Health CourtPathways to careSocial and Structural Determinants of Mental Health

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.