ArticleAging clinical and experimental research2024
Towards a core outcome set (COS) for intrinsic capacity (IC) intervention studies in adults in midlife and beyond: a scoping review to identify frequently used outcomes and measurement tools.
Article in Aging clinical and experimental research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prevalence of intrinsic capacity decline among community-dwelling older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Aging clinical and experimental research · 2024Pooled it
- Impact of a nurse-led multidomain intervention on intrinsic capacity among community-dwelling older adults in China: a cluster randomized trial.BMC public health · 2025Trial
- Measuring intrinsic capacity among Canadian adults: a population-based study using the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging (CLSA).Lancet regional health. Americas · 2026Article
- Intrinsic capacity across the adult lifespan in China: baseline analysis from the nationwide longitudinal PENG ZU cohort.GeroScience · 2026Article
- Intrinsic capacity as an indicator of the risk of depression and anxiety: a prospective cohort study based on the UK Biobank.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Multidomain intervention for delaying aging in community-dwelling older adults (MIDA): study design and protocol.Annals of medicine · 2025Article
- Cumulative effect of intrinsic capacity domains on geriatric syndromes and functionality in older inpatients.BMC geriatrics · 2025Observational
- Associations between intrinsic capacity, plasma p-tau181 and cognitive function over a 5-year follow-up among community-dwelling older adults: a secondary analysis of the MAPT Study.The Journal of frailty & aging · 2025Observational
- Assessing intrinsic capacity for person-centred HIV care: a cross-sectional study in ageing populations in Malaysia and Hong Kong.Journal of the International AIDS Society · 2025Article
- Intrinsic capacity and recent falls in adults 80 years and older living in the community: results from the ilSIRENTE Study.Aging clinical and experimental research · 2024Article
- Frailty: a global health challenge in need of local action.BMJ global health · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This scoping review was conducted to identify the outcomes and measurement tools used in IC intervention studies, as first step towards the development of a core outcome set (COS) for IC trials. PRISMA-ScR and COS-STAD were followed. The review considered randomized controlled trials targeting IC published in Medline, Scopus, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and clinicaltrials.gov, until June 2023. Of 699 references, 534 studies were screened once duplicates were removed, 15 were assessed for eligibility, and 7 (4 articles and 3 protocols) met eligibility criteria. Twenty-eight outcomes were identified (19 related to IC and its domains and 9 unrelated). The most reported primary outcome was the change in IC levels postintervention (5 over 7 studies) and the most reported outcomes (either as primary and/or secondary) were the changes in physical performance and in depressive symptoms (6 over 7 studies). Fifty-five tools used to construct the domains' z-scores and/or assess the effect of interventions were identified (47 related to IC and its domains and 8 unrelated). The most reported tool was an IC Z-score, calculated by 4 domains' z-scores: locomotor, vitality, cognitive, and psychological (5 over 7 studies). The tools differed among studies (10 locomotor related, 6 vitality related, 16 cognitive related, 8 psychological related, 6 sensorial related, 8 unrelated tools). The vast heterogeneity (28 outcomes and 55 tools within 7 studies) highlighted the need of a COS. These outcomes and tools will be presented to experts in a future step, to select the ones that should be taken into consideration in IC trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.