Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38441725›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2024

Application of CRISPR/Cas9 Pooled Screening for a Non-immediate Readout Model.

Nihal Terzi Çizmecioglu

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Nihal Terzi ÇizmeciogluDepartment of Biological Sciences, Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey. nterzi@metu.edu.tr.ORCID 0000-0001-5778-764X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Linking phenotypes to genetic components has been an essential part of novel drug discovery, and screening methods have been widely employed to achieve such a goal. Screens can be conducted in either pooled or arrayed formats. Although arrayed screenings provide a better and cheaper alternative in small scale, the larger-scale screenings are conducted in pooled manner. With its adaptability to various models and conditions, CRISPR/Cas9 technology provides an invaluable alternative to classical and RNAi-based screening methods. Combined with high-throughput sequencing and bioinformatics, CRISPR-/Cas9-based pooled screening methods provide unbiased and robust data. In this protocol, we employed CRISPR-/Cas9-based pooled screening for a non-binary and non-immediate readout.

Indexed as

CRISPR-Cas SystemsComputational BiologyGene EditingHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansPhenotypeRNA, Guide, CRISPR-Cas SystemsRNA, Guide, CRISPR-Cas SystemsCas9CRISPRDifferentiationNeuroectodermPooled screeningSox1GFP

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.