Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38441626›Full record

SynthesisCancer chemotherapy and pharmacology2024

Predictive performance of population pharmacokinetic models of imatinib in chronic myeloid leukemia patients.

Jaya Shree Dilli Batcha, Vikram Gota, Saikumar Matcha, Arun Prasath Raju, Mahadev Rao, Karthik S Udupa, Surulivelrajan Mallayasamy

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Jaya Shree Dilli BatchaDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, Manipal College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India.
Vikram GotaDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology, ACTREC, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India.
Saikumar MatchaTitus Family Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Alfred E. Mann School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, USA.
Arun Prasath RajuDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, Manipal College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India.
Mahadev RaoDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, Manipal College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India.
Karthik S UdupaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal, India.
Surulivelrajan MallayasamyDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, Manipal College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India. msv.rajan@manipal.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-2568-5096
Manipal Academy of Higher Education · INTata Memorial Hospital · INUniversity of Southern California · US

Funding

Indian Council of Medical Research 45/15/2022-PHA/BMS
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimChronic myeloid leukemia is a myeloproliferative neoplasm associated with the specific chromosomal translocation known as the Philadelphia chromosome. Imatinib is a potent BCR-ABL tyrosine kinase inhibitor, which is approved as the first line therapy for CML patients. There are various population pharmacokinetic studies available in the literature for this population. However, their use in other populations outside of their cohort for the model development has not been evaluated. This study was aimed to perform the predictive performance of the published population pharmacokinetic models for imatinib in CML population and propose a dosing nomogram.

methodsA systematic review was conducted through PubMed, and WoS databases to identify PopPK models. Clinical data collected in adult CML patients treated with imatinib was used for evaluation of these models. Various prediction-based metrics were used for assessing the bias and precision of PopPK models using individual predictions.

resultsEight imatinib PopPK model were selected for evaluating the model performance. A total of 145 plasma imatinib samples were collected from 43 adult patients diagnosed with CML and treated with imatinib. The PopPK model reported by Menon et al. had better performance than all other PopPK models.

conclusionMenon et al. model was able to predict well for our clinical data where it had the relative mean prediction error percentage ≤ 20%, relative median absolute prediction error ≤ 30% and relative root mean square error close to zero. Based on this final model, we proposed a dosing nomogram for various weight groups, which could potentially help to maintain the trough concentrations in the therapeutic range.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsImatinib MesylateLeukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL PositiveModels, BiologicalProtein Kinase InhibitorsAdultDose-Response Relationship, DrugFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNomogramsAntineoplastic AgentsImatinib MesylateProtein Kinase InhibitorsChronic myeloid leukemiaDosing nomogramImatinibPharmacometricsPopulation pharmacokinetic model

Identifiers

PMID38441626
PMCPMC11258086
OpenAlexW4392470410

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.